From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50870) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ek9KV-0003Cc-3P for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2018 09:07:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ek9KQ-0000UC-52 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2018 09:07:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55142) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ek9KQ-0000U1-0j for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2018 09:07:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ek9KP-0002wv-QT for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Feb 2018 09:07:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#30379] [PATCH] gnu: bash: Don't specify default configuration filenames. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <87a7wlkp3a.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2018 15:06:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87a7wlkp3a.fsf@gnu.org> (Roel Janssen's message of "Wed, 07 Feb 2018 12:39:09 +0100") Message-ID: <87zi4iz288.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Roel Janssen Cc: 30379@debbugs.gnu.org Hi, Roel Janssen skribis: > In bug #29337 I reported a =E2=80=9Cproblem=E2=80=9D with our Bash packag= e: It reads > /etc/bashrc even when it shouldn't, according to its own documentation. > I also compared the behavior of Bash on CentOS to that of Bash on Guix > with the following test: > >> On CentOS 7, the following happens (yes, I added the echo-statement to >> /etc/bashrc on CentOS as well): >> $ env - bash --init-file <(echo "echo \"Goodbye, world\"") -i >> Goodbye, world >> >> On GuixSD: >> $ env - bash --init-file <(echo "echo \"Goodbye, world\"") -i >> Hello, world >> Goodbye, world > > I attached the proposed patch (removing -DSYS_BASHRC). May I push this > to core-updates now, or should I wait for the next core-updates cycle? Not now, because it=E2=80=99s still not merged (but you can help! :-)), but definitely soonish, hopefully within a few days. (I think that=E2=80=99s what we agreed on .) Thank you! Ludo=E2=80=99.