From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48978) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFf9a-0003iy-J9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2018 08:22:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFf9W-00053T-Jx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2018 08:22:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44216) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fFf9W-00053P-Fy for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2018 08:22:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fFf9W-00063R-AT for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2018 08:22:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#31018] closed (Re: [bug#31018] [PATCHv2] Improvements for our Emacs build system and fixes.) Resent-Message-ID: From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <87y3i6538o.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 08:21:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: (GNU bug Tracking System's message of "Thu, 03 May 2018 16:33:02 +0000") Message-ID: <87zi1b8xmg.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 31018@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Arun, > From: Arun Isaac > Subject: Re: [bug#31018] [PATCHv2] Improvements for our Emacs build system and fixes. > To: Maxim Cournoyer > Cc: 31018-done@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 03 May 2018 22:02:46 +0530 (3 days, 19 hours, 41 minutes ago) > Arun Isaac writes: > > Should emacs-scel only be a native input, or should it be a propagated input? > I made emacs-scel a propagated input, and pushed all commits as > discussed. No objections; thanks again :) Maxim