From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54114) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fwwdf-0006hP-3J for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2018 17:44:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fwwde-0004oF-9H for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2018 17:44:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39682) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fwwde-0004o9-5E for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2018 17:44:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fwwde-0008Pj-1K for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2018 17:44:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#32579] [PATCH] gnu: Add guile-mingw 2.2.3. Resent-Message-ID: From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen References: <87sh2xrod8.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3ciuvtv.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2018 23:43:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87y3ciuvtv.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Mon, 03 Sep 2018 23:15:08 +0200") Message-ID: <87zhwyfea9.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 32579@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: Hi! >> I created a mingw32 cross build for guile-2.0 some time ago, expecting >> to need it real soon for "work" or for LilyPond. Neither need >> materialized until now; but it very soon. >> >> Luckily, I found that Mike Gran did quite some work this spring on their >> wip-mingw-guile-2.2 branch; so I packaged the latest snapshot. > > Does that mean that Guile 2.2.5 will cross-build fine with > --target=3Di686-w64-mingw32? (I thought this was already the case > actually.) Well, if wip-mingw-guile-2.2 is merged; yes. I'm not sure why that hasn't happened yet, so there may be issues? > Ideally Guile fixes that are needed would go to =E2=80=98stable-2.2=E2=80= =99, and then > Guix would simply package the corrected version. Sure! Greetings janneke --=20 Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcademy.com