From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47835) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gaRiH-0003VM-Py for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 15:48:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gaRiD-0006Hb-Qz for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 15:48:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54595) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gaRiD-0006HX-OC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 15:48:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gaRiD-0008L1-L3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2018 15:48:01 -0500 Subject: [bug#33600] CDN performance Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <87imzpd70s.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> References: <20181203154335.10366-1-ludo@gnu.org> <87tvju6145.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftv7l6gy.fsf@gmail.com> <871s6qzo6m.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87y38tx365.fsf@gmail.com> <878t0thfp9.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> <874lbfd0sd.fsf@netris.org> <87imzpd70s.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 21:47:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87zhsy8v5l.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Giovanni Biscuolo , Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 33600@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Giovanni Biscuolo writes: > Mark H Weaver writes: > >> Giovanni Biscuolo writes: >>> with a solid infrastructure of "scientifically" trustable build farms, >>> there are no reasons not to trust substitutes servers (this implies >>> working towards 100% reproducibility of GuixSD) >> >> What does "scientifically trustable" mean? > > I'm still not able to elaborate on that (working on it, a sort of > self-research-hack project) but I'm referencing to this message related > to reduced bootstrap tarballs: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2018-11/msg00347.html > > and the related reply by Jeremiah (unfortunately cannot find it in > archives, Message-ID: <877eh81tm4.fsf@ITSx01.pdp10.guru>) FWIW the GNU list search can take message IDs: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=877eh81tm4.fsf%40ITSx01.pdp10.guru&submit=Search&idxname=guix-devel --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlwdUUYACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPruRwgAhSOerLH74Awnfrly6rUDSJy3ujd7d2AY8etcSQwf83A5XJhVJ6w2TMRw E1kE5aBeXDwL8tzfY0rvQC9BFMwouhpiR691ta8aGjXJ4XBN6VMQ2lstIR0i6jwb hsGGApGw62ftaO54DAxTr0N35aedkvWEbGYydCAJ5Hpb5LjReeCL/AU/A8lbuVYA n9KLfXuP8wv07Ss+xUdSudlDVsnnG+axXdBpP4mQl+556bsGldtz1QKGaN9l3wKR pZlM01aDmda5ZLnh/up/5LoMFmWK7SAq+sqrmKf79rxUt45FvcB3p/Yz9XIaKF3s JsMsd+SZs8m5xnM24A64jxvMUCAKLA== =W5IM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--