Hi Chris and Ricardo, Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > This seems like a good usability improvement. For clarity, I assume > that it's still configurable, however? Would be important if pushing > builds to a different machine. No, but you raise a good point :) I'll update this patch to make it configurable. Ricardo Wurmus writes: > This will overwrite an existing acl file on the remote with a copy > that differs only in the newly added key. > > Is there a chance for corruption, e.g. if acl->public-keys returns > something unexpected? I suppose it's possible. 'guix archive --authorize' doesn't seem to do any specific handling for it, but it doesn't hurt to be paranoid -- we "atomically" overwrite the GC root for the bootloader configuration, for example, and we could do something similar here. I'll include it in the updated patch. Regards, Jakob