From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47247)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1igcYV-0001ET-JK
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 17:40:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1igcYU-0007O5-GJ
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 17:40:03 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59658)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1igcYU-0007NQ-CG
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 17:40:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1igcYU-0002y4-AW
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Dec 2019 17:40:02 -0500
Subject: [bug#38390] [core-updates] Scheme-only bootstrap: merge wip-bootstrap
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.38390.B38390.157644957811374@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Timothy Sample <samplet@ngyro.com>
References: <87tv6qoank.fsf@gnu.org> <87sgm4m9fu.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87v9r0arni.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2vqdjwz.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87y2viyb2a.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8w9s284.fsf@gnu.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2019 17:39:28 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87o8w9s284.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
 \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
 \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Sun, 15 Dec 2019 22:33:47 +0100")
Message-ID: <87zhftgqn3.fsf@ngyro.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 38390@debbugs.gnu.org, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>

Hi Ludo,

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> skribis:
>
>> We are really getting there!  I would like to do a rewrite once Gash
>> 0.2.0 is out.  What to do about Gash Core Utils?  I also plan to do a
>> rewrite once MES 0.22 is out.
>
> I think we should probably wait for the Gash and Gash Core Utils
> releases so we can refer to them directly.  How does that sound to you,
> Timothy?

I=E2=80=99m planning on releasing Gash tonight, so that should be okay.  :D

For the utilities, it might take some time (especially since we are
running up against the holidays).  My current plan is to do it as
quickly as possible, meaning that I will focus on the bare minimum for a
first release.  Even then, it won=E2=80=99t be speedy: besides cleaning up
what=E2=80=99s there and setting up the build scripts, I will have to coord=
inate
with the folks at Savannah to get another Git repo.

Even if it takes a few weeks for a release, I think it makes sense to
wait.  This whole project has taken years!  What=E2=80=99s a couple of week=
s?
:)


-- Tim