From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39737) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j1aFU-0005id-Aj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:27:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j1aFT-0001KF-Ew for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:27:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51556) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j1aFT-0001Je-AP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:27:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j1aFT-0000r0-6M for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:27:03 -0500 Subject: bug#39522: [PATCH] gnu: dunst: Build dunstify. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: From: Nicolas Goaziou References: <20200209091109.28930-1-brice@waegenei.re> <87mu9rz5oj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <2f90edd9716114944689eb3e4abb0f36@waegenei.re> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 19:26:10 +0100 In-Reply-To: <2f90edd9716114944689eb3e4abb0f36@waegenei.re> (Brice Waegeneire's message of "Mon, 10 Feb 2020 08:57:19 +0000") Message-ID: <87zhdpvv3x.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Brice Waegeneire Cc: 39522-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Brice Waegeneire writes: > I wrote a new patch with your suggestion. Thank you! I applied it as 81565d23df3080b4d43d2ce0bfa49251827a34e9. > Sorry for the missing copyright lines in the previous patches you > merged, I thought it was non-mandatory on trivial modifications. I honestly do not know if it is mandatory in this case. However, trivial modifications may pile up and it could become a concern at some point. > I added one in this new one. Yay! Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou