Alexandros Theodotou writes: > Hi, > > Thanks for the review. > > On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 00:07 +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: >> > + Wolpertinger.") >> > + (home-page "http://distrho.sourceforge.net/ports") >> > + (license (list license:gpl2 ; found in doc directory >> > + license:lgpl3+ ; found in doc directory >> > + license:gpl3))))) ; mentioned in meson file >> >> This is a problem: GPL3 is famously incompatible with GPL2. If these >> plugins are licensed separately it would be good to list the license >> for >> each and take it from there. >> >> Even better (I think?) is to package each plugin separately. Then >> users >> can choose whether to combine these incompatibly-licensed plugins, >> but >> we as a distribution can not (and probably not DISTRHO either). >> >> Not sure what to do about it. Ideas? > > Why is it a problem? It's only a problem if you link them together > afaik. The plugins that this project produces are all separate > binaries, each under its own license. Right. If they don't share code it's probably okay. > I think we should just list the license for each included plugin. I'm a > bit against making separate packages - it would be a pain to maintain > and the plugins don't take up much disk space. Listing the license of each plugin sounds good to me.