From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id gGfGC5BdZF8fKQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 07:11:12 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id aDioB5BdZF+aNAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 07:11:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 381329404C9 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 07:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:49566 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJAY0-0000PM-T0 for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:11:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59958) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJAXu-0000OY-NC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:11:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57211) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJAXu-0001rS-EK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:11:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJAXu-0005IY-9O for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:11:02 -0400 Subject: bug#43425: [PATCH] gnu: openblas: Update to 0.3.10. Resent-From: Mathieu Othacehe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 07:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 43425 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Greg Hogan Cc: 43425-done@debbugs.gnu.org Mail-Followup-To: 43425@debbugs.gnu.org, othacehe@gnu.org, code@greghogan.com Received: via spool by 43425-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D43425.160041302220300 (code D ref 43425); Fri, 18 Sep 2020 07:11:02 +0000 Received: (at 43425-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2020 07:10:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40523 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJAXF-0005HL-Oq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:10:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52916) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kJAXE-0005H1-BT for 43425-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:10:20 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57278) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kJAX9-0001bH-0p; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:10:15 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:9d9d:97cc:d92a:8ac0] (port=49284 helo=cervin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kJAX7-0002r6-Vv; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 03:10:14 -0400 From: Mathieu Othacehe References: <87k0ws7bey.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:10:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Greg Hogan's message of "Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:47:55 -0400") Message-ID: <87zh5n1rxo.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: pQcfwrYoaiis Hey, > Thank you for the recommendation. I had changed the source to the > official github repo to enable the version check by the refresh > updater. Can the git tag not be regenerated in the same way as archive > uploads? New patch follows. Thanks for the updated version. Yes I guess it can happen but it's less likely. I added your copyright and edited a bit the commit message before applying. Mathieu -- https://othacehe.org