From: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
To: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Cc: Graham James Addis <graham@addis.org.uk>,
Josselin Poiret <dev@jpoiret.xyz>,
Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net>,
64173@debbugs.gnu.org, Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@gnu.org>,
Graham James Addis <grahamjamesaddis@gmail.com>,
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>,
64171@debbugs.gnu.org, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: [bug#64171] [bug#64173] [PATCH 0/1] guix: pack: add --entry-point-argument option
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 16:00:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zg2oqwkv.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sf8h51pq.fsf@gmail.com> (Simon Tournier's message of "Thu, 17 Aug 2023 13:48:33 +0200")
Hi,
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> skribis:
> Just to be sure to understand, the command-line could list several
> --entry-point-argument options, right?
Yes.
> Well, since the order of the various command-line arguments might
> matter, and since a ’reverse’ is suggested, and since all the Guix
> command-lines do not behave the same way – for instance “guix package”
> processes command-line argument from right to left; see #43585 or #50473
> [1,2]; anyway :-) – I would suggest to add a sentence in the
> documentation (manual) that the command-line arguments are parsed from
> left to right.
No: the ‘reverse’ puts them back in the right order (because
‘args-fold*’ traverses the option list from left to right and thus
conses the result in reverse order.)
HTH!
Ludo’.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-18 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-19 15:37 [bug#64171] [PATCH 0/1] guix: pack: docker add docker-entry-point options Graham James Addis
2023-06-19 15:38 ` [bug#64173] [PATCH 1/1] " Graham James Addis
[not found] ` <handler.64172.B.168718911211626.ack@debbugs.gnu.org>
2023-06-19 15:49 ` bug#64172: Acknowledgement ([PATCH 0/1] ] guix: pack: docker add docker-entry-point options) Graham Addis
2023-07-03 9:25 ` [bug#64171] [PATCH 0/1] guix: pack: docker add docker-entry-point options Ludovic Courtès
2023-07-03 12:44 ` Graham Addis
2023-07-03 16:40 ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2023-07-08 16:08 ` Graham Addis
2023-07-09 8:31 ` Josselin Poiret via Guix-patches via
2023-07-12 8:17 ` [bug#64171] [PATCH 0/1 v2] guix: pack: docker add --entry-point-argument options Graham James Addis
2023-08-17 9:42 ` [bug#64173] [PATCH 0/1] guix: pack: add --entry-point-argument option Ludovic Courtès
2023-08-17 11:48 ` Simon Tournier
2023-08-18 14:00 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2023-08-18 14:15 ` Simon Tournier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zg2oqwkv.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=64171@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=64173@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=dev@jpoiret.xyz \
--cc=graham@addis.org.uk \
--cc=grahamjamesaddis@gmail.com \
--cc=mail@cbaines.net \
--cc=me@tobias.gr \
--cc=othacehe@gnu.org \
--cc=rekado@elephly.net \
--cc=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).