From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43084) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctGOE-0000vK-LJ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:24:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctGOA-0005Aj-Nr for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:24:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53315) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctGOA-0005AL-JW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:24:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctGOA-00079J-7L for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:24:02 -0400 Subject: bug#26300: [PATCH] gnu: milkytracker: Update to 1.0.0. Resent-Message-ID: From: Kei Kebreau References: <20170329145250.3913-1-kei@openmailbox.org> <20170329150419.ytsjr7hndor7qjiv@abyayala> <871stgoyw1.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20170329160821.3hdsx2pdevub6wtg@abyayala> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 12:23:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170329160821.3hdsx2pdevub6wtg@abyayala> (ng0's message of "Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:08:21 +0000") Message-ID: <87y3vonjbj.fsf@openmailbox.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: 26300@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ng0 writes: > Kei Kebreau transcribed 1.3K bytes: >> ng0 writes: >>=20 >> > >> > Attribution-Noncommericial=E2=80=A6 doesn't that make them a candidate= for >> > exclusion in systems like Guix? >> > >>=20 >> Considering that the songs are data files and non-executable, the >> software is still free. If the sample songs turn out to be a problem, I >> can attempt to remove them in a snippet. > > It would help if we could document this. I don't think everyone will revi= ew > upstream material (FSDG and similar) for data files (music, images). > I would exclude CC licensed material which says "Noncommercial", but I'm > not a lawyer. It may also cause problems upstream as well. The software is under licenses with no commerical restrictions and the sample songs are under a noncommericial restriction, but they are shared in one tarball. That would constitute a conflict, right? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJY299xAAoJEOal7jwZRnoNR7UQAJf1rPLOa/dn5FLvSDsSbMPh RzKa1Bk6Owi652da92/LqgMkwMfrZN4HBoTqg6cbBPvpL5X9KjE7Qc5Q++qsOMen auhKwfe2Bpi0+Vqgpw4Y8ept1yqvo0gwrFCIRWvpPvQxlnfBN6QQsPxfUXZw3GFa DELAL0vJNX7phgXaKuOVos5JzvU2Tb6KHX164N9hAw/70pvUyGg5Wo3ari2KOrqO yKdDCtOgHzGNV0tjqcBK23mjqV3gt+QHREZ2mJz5ALLFEJ+7IUD7I66W6Rud68RY dxOtG27nDeHwMwL0OdB2IHMvV8Qp9AxiekSRU1NlDVmejvuZpp8qnfsj2Lly8YOc hxXOPsmiTm3CE6zmvCEEYXd1za+Gkzy7y7sbqKdsyc6eagch2UQUsjIs2cwrgN8g aoojzKO/X/K/+wRMHR3sXOGA4fLMzA6CnscRSyBqkmFaX7HH4Xb0XtpGSXJRLj0r 15o5QqV5lgyqu8LjM1ARKU1sFuQqfQXS39GzSAPG3CpRjUj7bxg6bfqGMCrexMg5 wSObiLpXYJNUwn5jFWfMwpQROTMNgrf7x8DfbiG89doGScVXtQLFV3eARZTYEYqm +t10hW2la/fH26DAPPWqc1g1szzCRgPUUdDJoxs3IgDkHXBEpGu4C9QpujgHIYN6 TilV2EbgojqmLI+CcQuR =pOsK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--