From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50443) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0OE5-0002vi-60 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 04:11:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0OE2-0003S1-0D for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 04:11:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55180) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0OE1-0003Rw-TC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 04:11:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d0OE1-0002Du-OB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 04:11:01 -0400 Subject: bug#26306: exim service patches (including mail-aliases-service-type) Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <87fuhvtlko.fsf@zancanaro.id.au> <87a87ruczg.fsf@gnu.org> <8760i2pvwp.fsf@gnu.org> <87k26isfaj.fsf@zancanaro.id.au> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:10:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87k26isfaj.fsf@zancanaro.id.au> (Carlo Zancanaro's message of "Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:57:56 +1000") Message-ID: <87y3uyt9us.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Carlo Zancanaro Cc: 26306@debbugs.gnu.org Heya, Carlo Zancanaro skribis: > On Mon, Apr 17 2017, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Did you have a chance to look into this? Those patches are 90% there! >> :-) > > Sorry, yeah. I started to look at it, particularly trying to fix the > MAIN PANIC DIE issue that you mentioned in the other mail. I do see the > same issue, but I've struggled to find out how to fix it. > > I have some time over the next few days, so I'll try to clean up these > patches and re-send them this week, but I don't think I'll be able to > fix the segfault/MAIN PANIC DIE issue. I'm fairly sure it only affects > the tests, though, and exim behaves normally when in actual use. Sounds reasonable; we can investigate that segfault further eventually. Thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99.