From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56907) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1exJOw-00033m-PD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:30:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1exJOs-000533-Qz for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:30:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59104) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1exJOs-00052e-OT for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:30:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1exJOs-0001ny-G0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:30:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#30836] [PATCH 2/3] guix import elpa: use #f for license Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 22:29:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Konrad Hinsen's message of "Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:53:51 +0100") Message-ID: <87y3iql7b7.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Konrad Hinsen Cc: 30836@debbugs.gnu.org Konrad Hinsen skribis: > Elpa doesn't supply license information. The current importer pretends th= at > everything is GPL3, which is not true. The importer should not invent lic= ense > information. Do you have examples of packages on ELPA that are not GPLv3+? I don=E2=80= =99t know if this is the case, but I wouldn=E2=80=99t be surprised if it had a p= olicy of requiring GPLv3+ given that Emacs itself is GPLv3+. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.