From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33664)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1giWwO-0003yZ-PS
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:00:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1giWwN-00014T-QF
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:00:04 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57999)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1giWwM-00013B-Rx
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:00:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1giWwM-0005iP-Gl
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:00:02 -0500
Subject: [bug#34048] [PATCH] gnu: z3: Update to 4.8.4.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.34048.B34048.154735196221896@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Amin Bandali <bandali@gnu.org>
References: <87wonaaitq.fsf@aminb.org> <20190112233038.GB16245@jasmine.lan>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 22:57:02 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20190112233038.GB16245@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of
	"Sat, 12 Jan 2019 18:30:38 -0500")
Message-ID: <87y37pqkfl.fsf@aminb.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: 34048@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Leo,

Thanks for the reply.

[...]

>
> I tested this patch and found that arachne-pnr fails its test suite
> after upgrading z3.
>
> Can you take a look?
>

Do you have test suite logs from before and after applying the patch?
Running =E2=80=98guix build arachne-pnr=E2=80=99 seems to fail for me on bo=
th =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99
and on my local =E2=80=98z3-4.8.4=E2=80=99 branch with my patch applied, so=
 I=E2=80=99m not sure
if it=E2=80=99s my patch that=E2=80=99s broken its test suite.

Also, I=E2=80=99m a bit of Guix newbie, and I=E2=80=99m curious about if, a=
nd how, you
test all the packages, only those that depend on Z3, or if you happened
to stumble upon arachne-pnr=E2=80=99s failure.

Thanks,
amin