From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50787) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gnoJn-0002ce-HP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 12:34:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gnoJm-0006Cw-PU for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 12:34:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48582) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gnoJm-0006Cc-Cz for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 12:34:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gnoJm-0004SV-1Z for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 12:34:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#34222] [PATCH 07/15] gnu: Add ruby-webmock. Resent-Message-ID: References: <87y376ghl0.fsf@cbaines.net> <20190127170820.28937-1-mail@cbaines.net> <20190127170820.28937-7-mail@cbaines.net> From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: <20190127170820.28937-7-mail@cbaines.net> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 18:32:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87y376ropf.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Christopher Baines Cc: 34222@debbugs.gnu.org Christopher Baines writes: > Required by ruby-rest-client. Also at version ~> 2, so don't package 3 ju= st > yet. > > * gnu/packages/ruby.scm (ruby-webmock): New variable. [=E2=80=A6] When version 3 is already available, I=E2=80=99d prefer to explicitly name = this =E2=80=9Cruby-webmock-2=E2=80=9D, so that other people know it is on purpos= e. > + (propagated-inputs > + `(("bundler" ,bundler) Does =E2=80=9Cbundler=E2=80=9D really need to be propagated? -- Ricardo