From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60451) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hhByZ-0006eX-Qi for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 07:57:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hhByY-0002Qt-LR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 07:57:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58229) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hhByY-0002Qj-He for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 07:57:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hhByY-0005Uq-Dh for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 07:57:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#35790] [PATCH] scripts: lint: Handle warnings with a record type. Resent-Message-ID: References: <20190518093206.22069-1-mail@cbaines.net> <878suz27ke.fsf@gnu.org> <87ef4dxgvl.fsf@cbaines.net> <87pnnpj15u.fsf@gnu.org> <87h88pu1cc.fsf@cbaines.net> <875zp0lbmx.fsf@gnu.org> <875zovmqey.fsf@cbaines.net> <87pnn3cr7f.fsf@gnu.org> From: Christopher Baines In-reply-to: <87pnn3cr7f.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 12:56:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87y31kli4q.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 35790@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi Chris, > > Christopher Baines skribis: > >> Thanks, so if I set the bindtextdomain, things do indeed work >> better. So, regarding these two patches, I've got the following things >> on my mind... >> >> - As they change so many things, I'm not sure what to add for the GNU >> changelog at the end of the commit message? > > I think you should try to write the commit log the usual way, by > listing every changed entity. It=E2=80=99s a bit tedious, but it=E2=80= =99s also a good > way to review everything (and Magit makes it relatively easy.) Ok, I've now made an initial attempt at this, and sent some updated patches. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAl0XUfVfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9Xc88Q//UL8IyGSje241shndq9UNY1fVHSGXMepA3kUZuZ+Dkep43HDevhDzelis xdKWngXcQPZFp9GtyHlL5dle+q+laJdZhnWN2VehpIyz8RnGMxMQXKH4kIQkikp8 TciWhGehctQdP1g71EMk8LwxPgFw48JRFjiH5/BO34pspbBKANh3+PCv7OPuObid M5JyeNvhZAXT0b8TgCnztTVGgYS9Wvt7tJSCzej+v/JN5hR9+fgtqO7163V/h//S 5cu77CS67xXEp35a6VKDsYDt5q6XxUyMf5pimCsaUr1AxZgH47wDws1gXKiUqsmy BIJxhF/fRpU8mA1Rb1Hu7DkMdECTBJ2IbXjBn+lUZWHxeBgU5aNA3viAxkUDedQP PVhOgGwBJAohzIN3m3qP8j4zS7sGVhOab66nar4tQokr2lt4rb6dfLZHYL2ZSHD5 wq7RyeUdqUOheRvEFLZuu6i3IILSU6cPigD78LrFg9/i3DzdZzc6Smbn4E+0nDWE nLEeJt8aUSH9HyPEtDt3lBcf9rSuUceCpfql8lQQT+bUyegdduCZy0O6pnTyL/Sc 0TC7o1TBqq57V4pNWxX9Omircu3Asr9ysCD+bu1I1dKTckxhizTHY8avzprQbDDv cXW7M82IqKEtq4UTQlRrtg2OouVNG3mSnqTC/8EfrxN/qMWezho= =1FV9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--