From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56445) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hizlZ-0001Sd-HL for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 07:19:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hizlX-0006yH-Jf for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 07:19:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41643) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hizlW-0006xd-Kn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 07:19:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hizlW-0004sL-FB for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 07:19:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#36469] [PATCH 2/2] pack: 'squashfs' backend records the profile's search paths. Resent-Message-ID: References: <20190702085601.10865-1-ludo@gnu.org> <20190702085601.10865-2-ludo@gnu.org> From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: <20190702085601.10865-2-ludo@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 13:17:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87y31erqu5.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 36469@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > From: Ludovic Court=C3=A8s > > * guix/scripts/pack.scm (singularity-environment-file): New procedure. > (squashfs-image): Use it, and create /.singularity/env/90-environment.sh. > * gnu/tests/singularity.scm (run-singularity-test)["singularity run, > with environment"]: New test, currently skipped. > * gnu/tests/singularity.scm (build-tarball&run-singularity-test): Add > GUILE-JSON to the profile. This looks good to me. I think it would be good to separate squashfs-image and singularity going forward as we discussed earlier, but for now mixing the two is fine. Thanks! -- Ricardo