From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44030) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hj4HD-0007cv-OI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 12:08:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hj4HC-0001uH-O2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 12:08:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42951) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hj4HC-0001tw-Dc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 12:08:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hj4HC-0003oi-7T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 12:08:02 -0400 Subject: bug#36213: [PATCH 4/4] gnu: Add pulseaudio-dlna. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <9f57b4cb-e4e9-4dfa-9308-9263b5edfe23@www.fastmail.com> <3ee05f72-19df-4eb0-89c0-37ddded34d57@www.fastmail.com> <87lfxg5t4y.fsf@gnu.org> <76eb1a48-171f-4e2c-9d3e-845f6dbcd0ea@www.fastmail.com> Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 18:07:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: <76eb1a48-171f-4e2c-9d3e-845f6dbcd0ea@www.fastmail.com> (Alex Griffin's message of "Tue, 02 Jul 2019 16:01:27 +0000") Message-ID: <87y31d2386.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Alex Griffin Cc: 36213-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hi, "Alex Griffin" skribis: > On Tue, Jul 2, 2019, at 3:54 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> > +(define-public pulseaudio-dlna >> > + (let ((commit "4472928dd23f274193f14289f59daec411023ab0") >> > + (revision "1")) >>=20 >> Could you explain why you chose this commit rather than the latest >> release? > > Honestly, I just noticed that Debian was building from git. I assumed the= y had a good reason, so I didn't even try the latest release from 2016. OK. There have been quite a few commits since that 2016 release, so it probably makes sense to use the latest one. >> > + (arguments `(#:python ,python-2)) >>=20 >> Can it run on Python 3? >>=20 >> Since Python 2 is approaching EOL, we=E2=80=99re trying to avoid adding = more >> Python 2 packages. If we could remove =E2=80=98python2-=E2=80=99 packag= es from this >> patch series, that=E2=80=99d be great; if not, so be it! > > No, it doesn't run on Python 3. It's actually unmaintained right now, but= I'm not aware of any other free software projects that provide the same fu= nctionality. OK. I took the liberty to add some of what you wrote as comments in the code and pushed the whole series. Thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99.