From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41758)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iH2Nb-0006ZZ-H2
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 04:59:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iH2Na-0000MC-JF
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 04:59:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36727)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1iH2Na-0000M7-GS
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 04:59:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1iH2Na-0005ku-Cy
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Oct 2019 04:59:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#37553] [PATCH] inferior: Change to use the (guix repl) module.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.37553.D37553.157035230722083@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <20190929130128.18484-1-mail@cbaines.net>
 <20190929155728.27777-1-mail@cbaines.net> <87blv0sv2y.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87tv8sp8qn.fsf@cbaines.net> <87imp7jy01.fsf@gnu.org>
 <874l0mp8gs.fsf@cbaines.net>
Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2019 10:58:15 +0200
In-Reply-To: <874l0mp8gs.fsf@cbaines.net> (Christopher Baines's message of
 "Sun, 06 Oct 2019 09:46:27 +0100")
Message-ID: <87y2xygsig.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net>
Cc: 37553-done@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Chris,

Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> skribis:
>>
>>> Yep, I've been experimenting with loading older revisions in to the Guix
>>> Data Service, and this is one of the issues I came across.
>>
>> Nice!  I=E2=80=99ve been thinking we should have time-traveling continuo=
us
>> integration.  Like checking that we can build some Guix revision of the
>> past in between two =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 merges.
>>
>> It would also be useful to flag known-bad revisions, but in a way the
>> Data Service is already doing that for recent revisions.
>
> So I've been looking at retrying failed jobs in the Guix Data Service,
> there are a few where it's just networking issues talking to Savannah.

Cool.

> I guess it could be useful to have a list of revisions which can't be
> used through guix pull or a channel, and that information could also be
> used in the Guix Data Service.

Yes, thanks for looking into it!

Ludo=E2=80=99.