From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46708) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iVgAW-0001JC-3T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 13:18:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVgAV-0003wj-4S for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 13:18:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56765) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iVgAU-0003wS-US for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 13:18:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iVgAU-0003bB-OK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 13:18:02 -0500 Subject: bug#38060: [PATCH] gnu: CMake: Update to 3.15.5. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <20191112052811.GR17621@sax.terramar.selidor.net> References: <20191104165746.GJ17621@sax.terramar.selidor.net> <87h83irc8r.fsf@gmail.com> <87eeyfjq11.fsf@devup.no> <20191112052811.GR17621@sax.terramar.selidor.net> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 19:17:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87y2whf1hc.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ivan Vilata i Balaguer Cc: 38060-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Mathieu Othacehe --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Ivan Vilata i Balaguer writes: > Marius Bakke (2019-11-11 00:00:10 +0100) wrote: > >> Ivan: if you need the newer CMake on 'master', can you submit a patch >> that adds a separate 'cmake-3.15.5' variable? Then you can use that in >> cmake-build-system with '#:cmake ,cmake-3.15.5'. > > Sure, I'm attaching the patch which I tried and seemed to work (at least for > installing `cmake@3.15.5` explicitly and using it). > > Is it ok like this or shall I send it to guix-patches? Attaching patches to bug reports is fine. Pushed as 528b52390d216d8a8cd13dfcd1e6e40a6448e6c2. Thanks! --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl3O678ACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPrXPQgAiYqWh43rvrqU2vMfEhn3Jo3ZzE4cbsWhtCOwUwk/bNsIGU/nkKNIpyFb 4dyASvIlfSH6kwKeA2tjHlHgqqAMVcVE5NNnHMgTscM8kSc8FJgS2ZtNdXzMQ4Wk GQ7u0t0ZZRA+9eiyZGPeOwWmr3St0HyorQX3PM6qqb29ZkPV0QdF7WXTkP8Y8xxO wBZjluvrT3AuulA46fVhkZjkprWxDHu6yYEgeuO4TeWOKmW6kKNrKVMR1TtOOfUJ Usa6NfylaUX0m3qi2NBbc29/upygMSNoVgmw/4U+/mfZFJNgadVTFMC8x5aIpp5x tInfj1+Y00BGGfD+rpABHvKogIM8hw== =CYGK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--