From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55438) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ipgTD-0005EH-Kr for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 17:40:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ipgTC-000616-9x for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 17:40:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47302) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ipgTC-0005zr-2U for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 17:40:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ipgTB-00073d-VA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 17:40:01 -0500 Subject: bug#38846: [PATCH 4/4] DRAFT doc: Add a cooption policy for commit access. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <20200101163446.5132-1-ludo@gnu.org> <20200101163446.5132-4-ludo@gnu.org> <87a770dv07.fsf@nckx> Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 23:39:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87a770dv07.fsf@nckx> (Tobias Geerinckx-Rice's message of "Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:29:12 +0100") Message-ID: <87y2ugqmp7.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: guix-maintainers@gnu.org, 38846-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice skribis: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A >> +@item >> +Send @email{guix-maintainers@@gnu.org} a signed message stating >> your >> +intent, listing the three committers who support your application, >> and >> +giving the fingerprint of the OpenPGP key you will use to sign >> commits >> +(see below). >> + >> +@item >> +Once you've been given access, please send a message to > ^^^^ > > Probably just me, but this glosses over maintainer approval just a bit > too deftly, and that even with 3 signed referrals commit access isn't > guaranteed, just extremely likely. > > Unless that will actually change, I think we should briefly mention it > as well. People react worse to =E2=80=98let's try again later=E2=80=99 w= hen they > think they've already passed. Understandably so. Good points (from Maxim, too). >> +@email{guix-devel@@gnu.org} to say so, again signed with the >> OpenPGP key >> +you will use to sign commits. That way, everyone can notice and >> ensure >> +you control that OpenPGP key. > > Best to add an explicit =E2=80=98before pushing your first commit=E2=80= =99 here, if > that is the intent. Indeed. >> +When you get commit access, please make sure to follow > ^^^^ > > =E2=80=98If=E2=80=99? Same point as the first @items above. Yes. I=E2=80=99ve now pushed the whole series: ef09cb866c doc: Add a cooptation policy for commit access. 98ebcf1c1b doc: Encourage patch review. 2d315cd428 doc: Move "Commit Access" section from 'HACKING' to the manual. a7bde77d24 doc: Add "Tracking Bugs and Patches" section. I believe I=E2=80=99ve taken into account all the changes that were propose= d. If you think anything still needs to be adjusted, let=E2=80=99s do that. Thanks everyone! Ludo=E2=80=99.