From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57386)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jGhBA-0002xw-L8
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 06:53:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jGhB9-0005vW-Cg
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 06:53:04 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47990)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jGhB8-0005u0-HE
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 06:53:03 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jGhB8-0003ql-GY
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 06:53:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#38149] [WIP] gnu: Add qgis.
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.38149.B38149.158504713414563@debbugs.gnu.org>
References: <20191109112702.14723-1-wz@freeshell.de> <87a748ieb1.fsf@yamatai>
 <cu7pnd2vlap.fsf@systemreboot.net>
From: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv@posteo.net>
In-reply-to: <cu7pnd2vlap.fsf@systemreboot.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:52:00 +0100
Message-ID: <87y2rqja9b.fsf@yamatai>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
Cc: 38149@debbugs.gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain


Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net> skribis:

>>  - Also, I only put GPL2+ and GPL3+ as license (like in Gentoo and Nix),
>>    and not the complete list for every file (like in Debian).
>
> Is this a good idea? I always thought we go the Debian way and try to
> document every single license. I would love it if we only had to
> document the "main license" but I'm not sure that is consistent with how
> other Guix packages are written. Thoughts?

I added the other licenses to the package definition (I hope I didn't
miss anything).
Pushed as 151f3d416cff16d7e7d57dd24756dc4357384a1f.

Should this issue be closed, or left open for the remaining failing
tests?

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQQkUwKxurH4Z/3KlryPP4Yfgut6mgUCXnnmUAAKCRCPP4Yfgut6
mvJGAP4/iMjvzb3nwVYlVlVZ21C4FhhMq5bkKEfshMTfcjvkuAEAlVJl03V7nwVz
S67CIYiA3fhjdJpKAi14AgZf4riipw8=
=7JV5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--