From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34728) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJXN1-00042Y-5v for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 03:01:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJXMz-0005N3-VO for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 03:01:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54072) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJXMz-0005Mw-SA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 03:01:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jJXMz-0007d7-OJ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 03:01:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#40236] [PATCH] doc: Suggest Btrfs with compression instead of ext4 for root partition. Resent-Message-ID: From: Pierre Neidhardt In-Reply-To: <87tv24w1ql.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20200326083524.20275-1-mail@ambrevar.xyz> <87h7y5z3x0.fsf@gmail.com> <87lfnga83c.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87tv24w1ql.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 09:00:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87y2rf8zcx.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: 40236@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Maxim Cournoyer writes: >> By the way in your patch you did not document the syntax (options >> "subvol=3D..."). > > Are you sure you are looking at the right patch series > (https://issues.guix.info/issue/37305#16)? I documented usage examples > for a root file system using Btrfs subvolumes. I was looking at the wrong patch indeed, sorry about that! :) >> Is it supported nonetheless in your patch? > > Yes. > >> Is it supported in current Guix? > > Not currently; the patch set is in review :-). I have it running on 3 > machines and there's a system test which shows it working as well, so > don't be afraid to try it! Does this go on master or core-updates? Does it rebuild the world? I don't have much hardware to build anything at the moment, so I can only t= est this if it's a small build ;) =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl6EO/4ACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH94lQf+NhcqI68fQ04n/FcrzNbAzWzbHdMjV7SW5lqpbpMXLfktQaaSmNTS3tIO zbZ4atT4DlmWEdU7bXHLlEouc9gFpKouY89MOTHA7uIsjOWEj90D5UJzz2qO55rS 1O3wjbncSKHe2ydtnSJ2XzeFe/+/PnedpbPmfpiXdopJbhFbYsMxLsaMbeDx3R9T F9kYWknDiROcWd+11ZxBWEnJk58MARAeuFfJb87UAlrWCNm5oECm5E47Ch8RYYp1 yKXeJneiIpB2fifn0DeKAIBMyGKUEIhjEZtxJJPJOiHhhXZ4elvTtgqSCgYLFMRe 7va3s97e+X2u/Ys67XU2JxSwfhIzpg== =wHLf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--