From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55014) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jKXcN-0004Xb-Cj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 21:29:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jKXcM-0000xf-Cp for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 21:29:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60047) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jKXcM-0000xb-92 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 21:29:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jKXcM-0001VN-5g for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 21:29:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#40236] [PATCH] doc: Suggest Btrfs with compression instead of ext4 for root partition. Resent-Message-ID: From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <20200326083524.20275-1-mail@ambrevar.xyz> <87h7y5z3x0.fsf@gmail.com> <87lfnesxp6.fsf@gnu.org> <87pncqbbp5.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87zhbuqpns.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 21:28:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87zhbuqpns.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Thu, 02 Apr 2020 10:04:39 +0200") Message-ID: <87y2rc6nuk.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 40236@debbugs.gnu.org, Pierre Neidhardt Hello, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi, > > Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > >> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >> >>> Also, the installer defaults to ext4 and that=E2=80=99s probably a more= tested >>> configuration currently. >> >> Could a subvolume-less Btrfs be more problematic than ext4? >> If not, it might be a good idea to also switch to Btrfs in the installer. > > I think it=E2=80=99s more work than just switching: we have to do enough > testing, add new automated tests, etc. Fine points. > Also, any change in this area should happen post-release. :-) Agreed! Let's keep this issue open and revisit what extra tests and validation should be done after the release to consider a switch viable. Maxim