From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id 2FgCGGkyuGXgyQAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:19:05 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id 2FgCGGkyuGXgyQAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:19:05 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=MJlfsCXx; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1706570345; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=DTec68MxMla1tTUP/dMXQpjscM1pXfjaeXV1FHL/US8=; b=fWWdOalE5/Y4v9hJFD8vFVbZH1oxEWXELTt80vkXtZM3rLn98BVs05BE1e0ffjrMbw0Aag 4d5jqwWFoePM0qklI5UfTHKXAKTmAPMDzMWOfFm8cI4JHagfFFW0ulW3MWxlY2GAqOIJSg EvuC3mSVJ9L2eoxbaSFKMTmRqAlaLhbTDbzgWOKg29mno6t6XHV9egv9cwDrdXSrLV/zPu 2/gdxMAV2Mn8LWpte099Atw0zpgoKd5mfIAtJyfrsrRd2hvvgtgwF0kXvp6tpW2SPdSLuQ YQGsb4fx2euIiitMyvN3yi2Jvp0c5OzL1jQDANqjg+yXccTZaLczVDYQXE4C7g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=MJlfsCXx; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1706570345; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Hvyg2/tXb9NhDpqaLr932Yk5k+Mz8chiu6nqyr6b2CMQ54e9tqyKgKAATWahoMY28U5Qm+ f3OKnaPLlFlFygRiuZmWy+aukhVQZpQtMIfR7htM2krATuGbgOPoUYjGdZl1YaE6SYDeIN AxeDzHJ1xwlP43CQkhpZdDd+L8WQvqvYyzJyBCZ5cQn5yBN7vHutQkIgA7UyKp5iCCkCC2 dnw9e35vn2tImO5byrxKC83YykrZUmcdgHugCNQZ+o/f/d3FURXBUWsoXOhMhkSGvX41V/ rfv/BhdFDNBxhppbzJni5irN/fOrhAI9yFryUYuSTF442mgfVTcIApQAh8FS4Q== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BDD060253 for ; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 00:19:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rUau2-0001o1-TE; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 18:18:58 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rUaty-0001lg-Lg for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 18:18:55 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rUaty-0002fW-Ca for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 18:18:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rUau6-0000nv-DN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 18:19:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#68763] [PATCH 0/7] gnu: Improve go-honnef-co-go-tools definition. References: <20240127165557.3580-1-ngraves@ngraves.fr> In-Reply-To: <20240127165557.3580-1-ngraves@ngraves.fr> Resent-From: Sharlatan Hellseher Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 23:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68763 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 68763@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 68763-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68763.17065702953029 (code B ref 68763); Mon, 29 Jan 2024 23:19:02 +0000 Received: (at 68763) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2024 23:18:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33734 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rUatK-0000mn-NK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 18:18:14 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::335]:52301) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rUatI-0000mX-9o for 68763@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 18:18:12 -0500 Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-40e80046264so43782925e9.0 for <68763@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:18:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1706570277; x=1707175077; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DTec68MxMla1tTUP/dMXQpjscM1pXfjaeXV1FHL/US8=; b=MJlfsCXxQzk5myMc9WlaV858qcnLxmp54fz+WVHteDM+4UlfYgYKBSHUnSqp2zgfF+ xmMvzRWSEgUWlLTCOGzSFROvARJgAor2C3K2lJ/3aA18rNzZue793lzD7nMdqDdcjZZI A36SLA3njALGgQZDu1bgJKgss4ZsnHcs8etXl8o3EhiDERHoqPN/plYbrafaXXHZ+MX6 WEJ7tbs1GsQ/TtQZreJ5lLLTfNG+mJ3mdY0sRa3b+o0vmMDjKEpD70Hj3KXyphPrsFP3 olUFQuAMVX9FlCy+f2Lo61LFkr3v/mQPYH17aHVIZM37aRqj7bfascoMm5RO0RBFWoiM 9Hcw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706570277; x=1707175077; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DTec68MxMla1tTUP/dMXQpjscM1pXfjaeXV1FHL/US8=; b=Po4iHXu2i9LCJLnMfybzD3SwtWeeX1tkqaI8thDIaCTKuVgVo4qI8SW/3raT4VHBP1 dH2fGWNUkhNF5IRyTOLBOrlZL655TZqaq0xKYEduX3v9qsnz/I0d8NHFjMaXr55Fi+Do ucyYl8Qr0phO/TJ8LBuAfONJZ2RODtX691afefIca4mfbE1MeytSZJ9yjujH+8EilL0r Cu1W3YjiN2Ida53Xoec1JCvGQnY31+S9YVMPdnr+1Hv9UbnrBya2slGQUo6AEPGaIBCm SkTk59dfw/02LlFb/oB4f7esYRHpEnydk2MsIkCUD2UNAY8acP15p0EPmgHejF4M6d8o 9IkQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxOYMHkZb+TrqrHaAy/LYYR6BRNHXf3Rby+1vXhsiUtCrzYBPw6 426bHowI7tAu+5nmbL/S7iIwKMUzt4ZB5pcFiVICeeWA4kN8Q9b2j26kWxd7cSw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGCFEhrRpSoyp3mF1QJTB7hdg2XrLQBCrNfLrN3ktBs7osDfT6v5eDK5KqN+B4ZH2+4o+OtVA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ef4b:0:b0:33a:e9ee:f2a6 with SMTP id c11-20020adfef4b000000b0033ae9eef2a6mr3357899wrp.15.1706570276904; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:17:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from guxtil (cpc100856-bagu15-2-0-cust368.1-3.cable.virginm.net. [82.25.93.113]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u18-20020a5d4352000000b003392b1ebf5csm9116042wrr.59.2024.01.29.15.17.56 for <68763@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 29 Jan 2024 15:17:56 -0800 (PST) From: Sharlatan Hellseher Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 23:17:54 +0000 Message-ID: <87y1c7sp99.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.75 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Spam-Score: 0.75 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4BDD060253 X-TUID: fKGEr4QUBeBj --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Nicolas,=20 Thank you for the patches. I started reviewing them, and I've faced with this naming puzzle I could resolved. Do we need 'go-' prefix for the packages providing end user executables e.g. 'go-structlayout-optimize'? Some rational for not using 'go-' prefix for final command: there are some examples like 'kubo', 'nsq' or 'docker' which are not prefixed. How about to drop it and keep 'go-' convention for the module/library package which the final one inherited from? Regards, Oleg --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEmEeB3micIcJkGAhndtcnv/Ys0rUFAmW4MiIACgkQdtcnv/Ys 0rXbyRAAgHJNd2jVzhj2hFAm2pMNMtSG5BReATzp9bqkhqx98yP9kmyKTbmBNrps TSzgW9OdV0OJa1LHk96LsZmynxJ1zVc7UakVXLq5tNhP2I5qkriTFCIrkSeG1Mxm a5tSyetaZh+9qIrzNw8kxvV5zB/X2A97h33jDUxRPPKQW5VXJf0kHbiPfzVrnOWv 2SfiQI294ww4s4R0HJrndwQs2P+CVSxyQjNUb10qT3Dkj+IMXXYSkD0hpjwrcCRf fMm6B4xWnJzDLKJnINl44nC7QMeH23zOS5sx3QNPr5AslUwWGwHfvXyFWUOlSwSB V0bP52lCTvLS1KMAYOsDJEslAt6rsHCjQ/OxM/zmScx4PJzH5c0LKDWFw9qyBdsu LyNlUstCPSwATQIR777ZAxz6e5uRGkNdvgLu/UAIpocBiMj20WveLBK3tCze8/Lw fVauSKDGtzynPgfSC16qvHE4WxtgeVXcAMFwx59MVmWk54GPjgFhehPf9UMJyIzl pVHSy+4zhqH7f1EzD32QZx3B12alulCu39Jp81kqn1/wdnsBH5TQ6uXFICgjXewC WMWLkZkP25op3ML0e9Y2Ol44AvvqLl/hByFLabO6r6zxaWWPDH3aaveUEJqbAQ5Q e6a18kJ0zjoAdbQcY12ugA8xVyNOI0DuKCj33q/s8hA/Rpqlu4k= =4Ie8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--