From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38777) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2LZL-0007qW-E1 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 13:45:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2LZH-00047o-7y for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 13:45:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38510) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2LZH-00047i-4O for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 13:45:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d2LZG-0007aH-MK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 13:45:02 -0400 Subject: bug#26534: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. Resent-Message-ID: From: Kei Kebreau References: <87a87ga233.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaq4kw2n.fsf@fastmail.com> <871ssr2o7x.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuh7knbv.fsf@fastmail.com> <87shl6r8d2.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 13:44:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87shl6r8d2.fsf@gnu.org> (Roel Janssen's message of "Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:12:57 +0200") Message-ID: <87wpabj9x4.fsf@openmailbox.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Roel Janssen Cc: 26534@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Roel Janssen writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> Roel Janssen writes: >> >>> Marius Bakke writes: >>> >>>> Roel Janssen writes: >>>> >>>>> From 802c557c95ae9cbe7edeec1ab58fc05ef4c4cd32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>>> From: Roel Janssen >>>>> Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 15:53:54 +0200 >>>>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Update glib to 2.52.1. >>>>> >>>>> * gnu/packages/glib.scm (glib): Update to 2.52.1. >>>>> --- >>>>> gnu/packages/glib.scm | 4 ++-- >>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/glib.scm b/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>>> index 6de9cce0b..4e29a550b 100644 >>>>> --- a/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>>> +++ b/gnu/packages/glib.scm >>>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") >>>>> (define glib >>>>> (package >>>>> (name "glib") >>>>> - (version "2.50.3") >>>>> + (version "2.52.1") >>>>> (source (origin >>>>> (method url-fetch) >>>>> (uri (string-append "mirror://gnome/sources/" >>>>> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ shared NFS home directories.") >>>>> name "-" version ".tar.xz")) >>>>> (sha256 >>>>> (base32 >>>>> - "16frrwhc1yqkzx6bgh3060g94dr2biab17fb01mrni819jzr9vl2"= )) >>>>> + "0vsqrvjwsk2x3mm2i428hpm5vgsi1b384l6xdhm7xmzj2yw2d34l"= )) >>>>> (patches (search-patches "glib-tests-timer.patch")))) >>>>> (build-system gnu-build-system) >>>>> (outputs '("out" ; everything >>>>> --=20 >>>>> 2.12.1 >>>>> >>>>> Dear Guix, >>>>> >>>>> Is it OK to update glib? >>>> >>>> I suspect this would require some other GTK updates as well. Maybe we >>>> can start a new "gnome-updates" branch[0] and try to bring everything = up >>>> to date. "glib" alone has almost 1500 dependent packages which is too >>>> much for "staging". What do you think? >>>> >>>> [0] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-10/msg00933.html >>> >>> This is a good idea. The ultimate purpose is to get the latest GNOME >>> release in GNU Guix. I cannot carry this task entirely myself, if we >>> would like to get it in before the next GNOME release.. ;) >>> >>> So, I am not sure we need to build everything on Hydra, since it's >>> already under a high load. Maybe it's enough to create a branch in the >>> Git repository and do the builds locally? >> >> I think pushing a "gnome-updates" branch to Savannah is a good start :) >> `./pre-inst-env guix refresh -u gnome` appears able to do the grunt of >> it. Let's start a Hydra evaluation once most packages are updated and >> see how it goes :) > > I pushed the branch and put the glib update there. I will push of > 'refresh -u gnome' there as well. > > Kind regards, > Roel Janssen Hi Roel, I'm looking at updating GNOME packages as well. When I tried building the most recent version of Eye of GNOME, glib gave me two test failures. Do you think these failures could be a result of glib dependencies needing to be updated, or is this fixable on its own? Thanks in advance, Kei --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEg7ZwOtzKO2lLzi2m5qXuPBlGeg0FAlj86AcACgkQ5qXuPBlG eg0y2BAAs4ZUKppGXqVpwYFSbrozbj/3Gn5iqapLS/kyufTFAE+d9DLxPr4Odz15 yT5hg+OQAzNFg+Wi9VpTs2dwh5UNO3NqDiF27VQRSry5kMmWG1RytmY8ScKTBkJx 3SvbOMx/c2TH72CRkd0UQDiU1JC4RR8+AGIHCskG1rpiSA0HkILSjPjdkv6Oplkb m+RplGFaJz5X14uVdgTj81ou7X8eHyk2frG9HHA83UDipN9ItuD8VnbpLvBT26fL KMaNU672zjv5HlF6CsLW/l3t1BQhPX6SGpXjPtK59IFEoUXqR8qKFZlxcsi7XjCy 3zClpKI/OLM+EmKKci9VUw7g73SN+RrNQ8WbKibjAnLFMFjyg4p0XgSgAhmp53Gk UjdQBvgN1c6Rqb83G2cnc/uQ75nYhc56sLTLFhDHwcHxgR+ZH+kagRahZ5BD93B5 GnwPI7/boPJ/tiQETOCHGjSTPHzxtCYds3gFK4nS9RZ4yQFPSlbKNbH39Vc6Qaj4 KivcjDxAWj5eCvA04zeUa3EM7zU4gILh3Nh+HeDhYmH3P9pNgQhwvAx+OyFYnIA4 SPpsCUUsRzdmR+52y887PN+FWuL1wJRnDn+6189Js1oBgyE9+RRJLLFIWaUIDoS7 sJjb0fc9tEdoNUZtppKRSzG8mKRkGqvfUP+OO9n0VCdPj8UtQWw= =HQ3u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--