From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42731) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duFbU-0002bF-PS for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 06:18:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duFbP-0001cP-4l for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 06:18:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38592) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1duFbP-0001bp-0W for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 06:18:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1duFbN-00042J-Nf for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2017 06:18:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#28491] [PATCH] doc: Add "Sending a Patch Series" subsection. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20170918092030.9691-1-janneke@gnu.org> <87h8w089a5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87377k3wz3.fsf@gnu.org> <874ls0ca6b.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87y3pc2f84.fsf@gnu.org> <87vakgat8s.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 12:16:50 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87vakgat8s.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Mon, 18 Sep 2017 18:04:03 +0200") Message-ID: <87wp4v56y5.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: 28491@debbugs.gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou skribis: > Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > >> Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> >>> Would it make sense to recall the need to close the thread by answering >>> to ? This information is surprisingly >>> hard to find. >> >> Yes, I think so. Added as a second patch, how is this? > > [...] > >> * doc/contributing.texi (Submitting Patches): Add a note about closing b= ug >> threads by mailing to NNN-done@debbugs.gnu.org. I=E2=80=99m fine with both patches, thank you! In the future, we should probably add a =E2=80=9CReviewing Patches=E2=80=9D= section as well. :-) Ludo=E2=80=99.