From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48495) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dwupx-0002w3-LR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:44:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dwupu-0008Oq-K8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:44:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53135) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dwupu-0008Oh-Fe for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:44:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dwupu-0005sy-55 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:44:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#27683] [PATCH] gnu: libjaylink: Update to 699b700. openocd: Update to 0.10.0 References: <20170713095923.4115-1-theodoros.for@openmailbox.org> Resent-Message-ID: From: Theodoros Foradis Message-ID: <87wp4lgv3v.fsf@foradis.org> In-reply-to: <20170723001221.GB24840@jasmine.lan> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:42:40 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 27683@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, > Overall the changes look good to me, but can you clarify if they need to > be applied in the same commit like this? It has been some time since I submitted version 2 of the patch, splitting it in two. I revisited the patch and it wouldn't apply on master, so I reply with the rebased patch that applies on current master. Regards, -- Theodoros Foradis