From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40807) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eEF5s-0003Xc-9j for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 08:48:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eEF5m-0003zJ-N9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 08:48:08 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57414) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eEF5m-0003z8-K6 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 08:48:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eEF5m-0005rR-Ci for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 08:48:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#29281] [PATCH] system: vm: Use linux-libre for system-disk-image. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20171113072236.13270-1-m.othacehe@gmail.com> <87o9o6bjsw.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgjazex2.fsf@gmail.com> <87vaiev5mu.fsf@gnu.org> <8760aev47t.fsf@gnu.org> <87lgja9yx5.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:47:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87lgja9yx5.fsf@gmail.com> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:54:30 +0100") Message-ID: <87wp2uthn7.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Mathieu Othacehe Cc: 29281@debbugs.gnu.org Mathieu Othacehe skribis: >> So the kernel you built doesn=E2=80=99t boot at all in =E2=80=9Cqemu-sys= tem-arm -M virt=E2=80=9D? > > Nope it does not with this command : > > qemu-system-arm -M virt -kernel > /gnu/store/13jqdcykaarbxzwxnryqinljcjh3k75g-linux-libre-arm-omap2plus-4.1= 3.4/zImage > -nographic=20 Oh, ARM is weird. :-) >> In practice =E2=80=98targeting-arm?=E2=80=99 could be checking (%current= -system) and >> (%current-target-system), which is not entirely correct but good enough, >> or, better yet, use that =E2=80=98let-system=E2=80=99 construct I sent y= ou recently to >> determine the actual target system. >> >> Thoughts? > > Sure it seems like a good idea, until we find better ! I'll try to setup > let-system and propose an updated patch. I can polish the =E2=80=98let-system=E2=80=99 bits, because maybe that wasn= =E2=80=99t fully baked. I=E2=80=99ll send it to guix-patches ASAP so you can review. Sounds good? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.