From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34445) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJ5Da-0004kZ-CI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 17:16:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJ5DX-0001Xd-6k for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 17:16:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51033) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJ5DX-0001XT-2b for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 17:16:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eJ5DW-0007Xm-Td for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 17:16:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#29457] [PATCH] gnu: emacs-org-contrib: Fix sha256 checksum due to emacs-org update. Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20171126170755.10891-1-clement@lassieur.org> Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 23:15:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20171126170755.10891-1-clement@lassieur.org> ("=?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur"'s message of "Sun, 26 Nov 2017 18:07:55 +0100") Message-ID: <87wp2cu1o2.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur , Nicolas Goaziou Cc: 29457@debbugs.gnu.org Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur skribis: > * gnu/packages/emacs.scm (emacs-org-contrib)[source]: Fix sha256 checksum. > --- > gnu/packages/emacs.scm | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs.scm > index acd6ec30a..7e16c8b4b 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/emacs.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/emacs.scm > @@ -4230,7 +4230,7 @@ reproducible research.") > (package-version emacs-org) ".tar")) > (sha256 > (base32 > - "0xy2xrndlhs4kyvh6mmv24dnh3fn5p63d2gaimnrypf1p8znwzh4"))= )) > + "071vqv6hdyjp85ap39930782ks07ypjzch81r8kax3ybwfrf0chx"))= )) Was the SHA256 simply erroneous, or was the file modified in-place upstream? It=E2=80=99s a good idea to investigate a bit in such cases IMO. Ludo=E2=80=99.