From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57284) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOVDD-0004Wi-9s for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:02:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOVD9-0002UH-CZ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:02:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48625) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOVD9-0002Tj-AI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:02:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOVD9-00068A-0L for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:02:03 -0500 Subject: bug#29466: [PATCH 1/2] services: web: Switch nginx related functions to use match-record. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: References: <87zi77lssn.fsf@gnu.org> <20171210084421.26404-1-mail@cbaines.net> <87po7lxnai.fsf@gnu.org> From: Christopher Baines In-reply-to: <87po7lxnai.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 21:01:22 +0000 Message-ID: <87wp1t568t.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 29466-done@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Christopher Baines skribis: > >> As this is less prone to mistakes than match. >> >> * gnu/services/web.scm (default-nginx-config, nginx-activation, >> nginx-shepherd-service): Switch from using match-lambda to match-recor= d. > > Awesome. LGTM! Great, I've pushed this and the previous patch. > PS: I=E2=80=99d rather let Cl=C3=A9ment or some other nginx-savvy person = comment on > the second patch. Yeah, that's fine :) I'll close this bug anyway, as the remaining patch I sent is not anywhere near ready yet. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAlou8iJfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9Xe/VBAAoM09wG7f/A4o2ApYeUjsEW/zcBJGX9AoDxmAidsIQ0tdmfQtUbuZkedS zIAeFZZEWR98PNtgs2nZm7ir2Otkk4p+iw1m6QL2cKANELuVnQMdJ3b0634CxzYz ld9IUDf/QBMVTruSvAfXfDOZz6Ug8rmeweggd3PkJIebo1pJ8N1ctRY+MqVfG7r2 BQBTKv2VEUs9InLQKY5fmeYvErYaXsBotsKdD1M1+kKMM8CFWZ2Y7pTvc3HnzGRa uHDvWMGGIwLLPJgRmESHHYci6WEKjsehLIzT7PopjRX3IJpmjXf8vhFjrMw7JJJ7 tfGHu777Nrif7k15ogKVcy+vR70o323LXM3gFV1sxTG/qWmWy9g0ktTHT/alNs8j pM7IdH4CyaZjKugYXWWs8sokAL63hQwkFMVdY2/anSNilzJQ6SrXasuphfjAHiht cW4spFjlIwlvEHDB60BCQ1hO4mrBQ2BfKWHKTZ278ZopsFI16P1H2HChnWtdBaFV aDOIFAC5WsDESZ7iyGuSfc1g21hn1BJVawRZm6qkM+VfNufuSM+qygoESYXIQ3Xt duN51Mti81fxmWZ669cwVIEH9EEDpY42jMwY07hLg5Ep0t030jARnFEqGKJI+AMg LQ16+tN876Bo42c6HLKj1Xrv79drM4+uDbdDVrwIE1f1nmfcONQ= =E2Ww -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--