From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56571) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQtGE-0002dN-Oe for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 06:07:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQtGA-0006iG-VA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 06:07:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59269) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eQtGA-0006hv-S9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 06:07:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eQtGA-0002Sw-D0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 06:07:02 -0500 Subject: bug#29628: [PATCH] services: nginx: Replace 'http-port' and 'https-port' with 'listen'. Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: References: <878teblp68.fsf@lassieur.org> <20171209193549.11016-1-clement@lassieur.org> <87tvwql5u4.fsf@cbaines.net> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur In-reply-to: <87tvwql5u4.fsf@cbaines.net> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:06:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87wp1k70sc.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Christopher Baines Cc: 29628-done@debbugs.gnu.org Christopher Baines writes: > Clément Lassieur writes: > >> * doc/guix.texi (Web Services, Version Control Services): Update accordingly. >> * gnu/services/certbot.scm (certbot-nginx-server-configurations): Likewise. >> * gnu/services/version-control.scm (%cgit-configuration-nginx): Likewise. >> * gnu/services/web.scm (, >> emit-nginx-server-config): Likewise. >> * gnu/tests/version-control.scm (%cgit-configuration-nginx, >> %git-nginx-configuration): Likewise. >> * gnu/tests/web.scm (%nginx-servers): Likewise. > > This looks good to me. Unfortunately this conflicts with some changes I > made to the nginx service, so it would be good if you could send an > updated patch. > > I think an extra use of the old configuration might have also appeared > in the docs/services as well. I updated it and pushed it. Thank you for reviewing! Clément