From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60384) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNdOa-00018h-B5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 09:11:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNdOZ-0007jK-GP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 09:11:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42336) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hNdOY-0007j0-SD for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 09:11:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hNdOY-0005ty-Dt for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2019 09:11:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#35518] [PATCH] fix guile-pfds bug Resent-Message-ID: References: <141212fdb5356cbf7ad955a70bc26379@hyper.dev> <871s1brg93.fsf@elephly.net> <053f858c51866da5ffe2ed2b85f58d9d@hyper.dev> From: Ricardo Wurmus In-reply-to: <053f858c51866da5ffe2ed2b85f58d9d@hyper.dev> Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 15:10:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87woj3pw3t.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: amirouche@hyper.dev Cc: 35518@debbugs.gnu.org amirouche@hyper.dev writes: > On 2019-05-06 13:09, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> amirouche@hyper.dev writes: >> >>> Forgo the first, this patch is not perfect because It doesn't force an >>> update. >> >> The attached patch is more than 15MB in size. I haven=E2=80=99t looked = at it >> but I guess that=E2=80=99s not correct. > > I am not sure which patch you are referring to. The one you attached in the message with Message-Id -- Ricardo