From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42294) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hhFGn-000231-G5 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 11:28:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hhFGm-0003qO-GV for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 11:28:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59519) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hhFGk-0003oz-Jq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 11:28:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hhFGk-0002Iw-DG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 11:28:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#36411] [PATCH] gnu: Add libresprite. Resent-Message-ID: From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice References: <87y31m7d62.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <30d2762e-8cea-fa2d-24df-68a019fcea90@riseup.net> <8736jthkkd.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> In-reply-to: <8736jthkkd.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 17:27:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87woh4bee5.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: "Jakob L. Kreuze" Cc: 36411@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jakob, I didn't check all the bundled packages, but at least freetype2=20 and libpng are trivial to unbundle (not patched in any way) and=20 probably the most important to, security-wise, so things are=20 looking good even if upstream wouldn't cooperate. Jakob L. Kreuze wrote: >> Synopsis? > > Inherited from 'aseprite'. Should I alter it to mention that > it's a fork of Aseprite? It's certainly not important enough to include in the synopsis, so=20 inheriting that is fine. Now, I'd say it needn't be added to the description either. We=20 generally don't note the often chequered ancestry of our packages,=20 nor the fact that they are =E2=80=98free=E2=80=99 or =E2=80=98open source= =E2=80=99, and this is=20 just a combination of the two. But at least description space is=20 cheaper if you disagree. ;-) Thanks for your work on Guix, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCXReDYwAKCRANsP+IT1Vt eVizAP4iM3K/ubCBNuqJhHISFcsJ55Wn1BtF9uxKIn/vScbC2gD/WCBgLCPp3K7x mNSC7fyOK21NTOm2jSSQUAlICtPuoAw= =Nv5y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--