From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33566) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1izujO-0005rV-Vn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 22:55:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1izujO-0003OU-11 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 22:55:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42820) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1izujN-0003N8-Tg for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 22:55:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1izujN-0001IG-SA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 22:55:01 -0500 Subject: bug#39457: Fix baud-rate option in inputattach-service Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: From: iyzsong@member.fsf.org (=?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?=) References: <87r1z7o93n.fsf.ref@yahoo.de> <87r1z7o93n.fsf@yahoo.de> Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2020 11:54:15 +0800 In-Reply-To: <87r1z7o93n.fsf@yahoo.de> (Tim Gesthuizen's message of "Thu, 06 Feb 2020 19:37:32 +0100") Message-ID: <87wo8z59y0.fsf@member.fsf.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Tim Gesthuizen Cc: Raghav Gururajan , 39457-done@debbugs.gnu.org Tim Gesthuizen writes: > Hi, > > the "baud-rate" option for inputattach-service is broken, the > inputattach program expects the option to be named just "--baud". > The attached patch fixes the issue. Pushed, thank you! > > Just out of interest: Should we stick in Guix to the option used by the > program or stick with the old name? > I would like to keep the "baud-rate" name as it is the thing the > parameter configures: The baud-rate for the connection. > I think both are fine, as we document it in our info manual. :)