From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id iJaZEOD+GF/FagAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 03:07:12 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id MOiKDOD+GF9+fQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 03:07:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 825C79403AD for ; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 03:07:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52552 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jyRZd-0005x5-Rf for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 23:07:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38910) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jyRZW-0005wj-I7 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 23:07:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60199) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jyRZW-0006Dx-90 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 23:07:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jyRZW-0006Ma-1F for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 23:07:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#42473] [PATCH] gnu: zrythm: Update to 0.8.694. Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 03:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42473 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Alexandros Theodotou , 42473@debbugs.gnu.org, GNU Guix maintainers Received: via spool by 42473-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42473.159547359124422 (code B ref 42473); Thu, 23 Jul 2020 03:07:01 +0000 Received: (at 42473) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jul 2020 03:06:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43512 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jyRZ1-0006Lp-B4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 23:06:31 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f193.google.com ([209.85.222.193]:45587) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jyRYw-0006La-KA for 42473@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 23:06:29 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f193.google.com with SMTP id u64so4086074qka.12 for <42473@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 20:06:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XnGiuG3yNlkv67KjhQkc7bKuPHGbJpwH8omg+DM/Q9E=; b=bXGLHvc4GPt4UzoVYsA5MRb/+HNdyrVARSAmlWkQlv3oBDMAWHgEJcyzlfFbk+OGve v/u2r9eybvMX6kJr0rFUmClmMzeThUQsdnPbabEC8vDuc4WLqtRrcnAsLxhyELWXKKLc gRn11whs+qoSueYDbWL16kElpR6jXFoHw2K29q7fv/ndCAuXQdxjZFiWS+6bQhr37bHa Zxn2US9gpwWO+JawANZSPwJqD98NilKKywxYj2FxFN8l40JrPKhTbloBD2Y8V5XrltjK Cbe7UW386JDEaAfOeCrPpml5FDFpPG+ijySU6HfDy99IWdhhLnAuEz0+hFSDYCPA9eIJ 5DCA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XnGiuG3yNlkv67KjhQkc7bKuPHGbJpwH8omg+DM/Q9E=; b=K2BOGVFyhbyZDymgAzCDj6iObzKCrnDLz7Mm/89wq8b/3WZuF05AuKuMjlBfwmMkPn eo6ayUvGVJfVfCBaCoD6in80EciMB4k8z5Duy73mehXGhmXtIsXYO1TumNX5XEMllIzs i3C0QB6HDgLnkmzaKqID8SWSUf4TqgpbAE7VcDNQXFzbyvld1/qEbhu1ZJlrLv8AxmUl ChlfoD7TYA3/mCZxUrNd5NxcKLqpKG+vz4AHmPwLp1RJpqal+vuYeiKQSWxiXs8ITwGA Jr9nnuBMlia4Ry8X8xg4LQmtXnc7Y/IEBjEL8uG2QSBizbjt3PmZ8uWNYl1DqVNpp2im 3FJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533j1etvb+DWwRmpJ5L+V7UWhtnYGd9Ih7i2cqKvzvpe/0SHZHTc srd7aM1MWNWYE6qJtHi7y/c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwClf8suoSQL4W06KHqF+Gan/fNfm7Amf9YWq14KfyC9Pg9R8FVi+ZOr578ydXCeGNf+tZWxA== X-Received: by 2002:a37:ef13:: with SMTP id j19mr3238397qkk.184.1595473580994; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 20:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-141-207.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.141.207]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z68sm1555572qke.113.2020.07.22.20.06.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 22 Jul 2020 20:06:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <0e6300fea9caa1f9d7645c968a7c5b50d89f7b5c.camel@zrythm.org> <87k0yvfb60.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 23:06:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87k0yvfb60.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Thu, 23 Jul 2020 00:16:23 +0200") Message-ID: <87wo2vdj6d.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=bXGLHvc4; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: dZr2luXwUBKg Hello, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi Alexandros, > > Alexandros Theodotou skribis: > >> This is actually 2 patches. The first updates libcyaml and the 2nd >> Zrythm. Note that I (Zrythm author) have added a trademark policy to >> Zrythm that says modified versions that include the trademarks require >> permission (as discussed on IRC with a few people): >> https://www.zrythm.org/en/trademarks.html >> >> I am not 100% sure if patching the xdg-open path counts as a modified >> version, but in any case this email is signed using the same key used >> to sign the release, so it can be interpreted as "written permission" >> to redistribute this. > > OK. Perhaps right above the =E2=80=98name=E2=80=99 field of the package,= you could add > a link to the trademark policy above and state that Guix has a written > permission to use it, with a link to your message? That way we=E2=80=99l= l have > an audit trail. That's a good idea. >> The FSDG allows trademarks from what I understand: > > Your interpretation seems correct to me. To me as well. >> So it is up to the maintainers to decide if they want to keep Zrythm as >> it is or rename it. Either way, I am happy with either decision, >> although I would prefer if you were OK with keeping the "Zrythm" name >> (as long as there's no patches to remove/add functionality or links to >> the Zrythm website or things like that). > > I don=E2=80=99t see any reason not to keep =E2=80=9CZrythm=E2=80=9D as th= ings stand. > > Thoughts anyone? (Cc: maintainers.) I wish the trademark restrictions were relaxed to include the right for modifications made solely with the goal of building/packaging/integrating the software with a free software distribution. This would make things hassle free and extra clear. That said, I'm not opposed to include Zrythm as things stands, if other maintainers are OK with it. Maxim