unofficial mirror of guix-patches@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 65352@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#65352] Fix time-machine and network
Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2023 19:37:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wmx5on5n.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o7iiqo6d.fsf_-_@gnu.org>

Hi,

On Mon, 04 Sep 2023 at 11:32, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

> In fact, now I recall why that procedure was written that way: it’s
> meant to say whether a given commit (and only a commit) is already in
> the checkout, meaning we don’t need to pull.  By definition, it’s an
> answer that can only be given for a specific commit; we cannot tell
> whether “master” or “HEAD” is available, that wouldn’t make sense.

Yeah, that’s the job of ’reference-available?’ to say if a given
reference is or not in the repository, IMHO.

The patch I proposed earlier fixes the issue you reported, I guess.


When debugging, I have noticed that this update-cached-checkout is
called many times.  For instance,
79ec651a286c71a3d4c72be33a1f80e76a560031 introduced a call.
Investigating, I notice that this new procedure is incorrect:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
       (define (validate-guix-channel channels)
         "Finds the Guix channel among CHANNELS, and validates that REF as
captured from the closure, a git reference specification such as a commit hash
or tag associated to CHANNEL, is valid and new enough to satisfy the 'guix
time-machine' requirements.  A `formatted-message' condition is raised
otherwise."
         (let* ((guix-channel (find guix-channel? channels))
                (checkout commit relation (update-cached-checkout
                                           (channel-url guix-channel)
                                           #:ref (or ref '())
                                           #:starting-commit
                                           %oldest-possible-commit)))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Here, the symbol ’ref’ is bound by:

            (ref          (assoc-ref opts 'ref))

which comes from:

         (option '("commit") #t #f
                 (lambda (opt name arg result)
                   (alist-cons 'ref `(tag-or-commit . ,arg) result)))
         (option '("branch") #t #f
                 (lambda (opt name arg result)
                   (alist-cons 'ref `(branch . ,arg) result)))

Therefore, it means that when none of the options --commit= or --branch=
is provided by the user at the CLI, this ’ref’ is bounded to #false.

Therefore, it can lead to unexpected behaviour when providing a
channels.scm file.

Well, instead, the correct something like:

         (let* ((guix-channel (find guix-channel? channels))
                (reference (or ref
                               (match (channel-commit guix-channel)
                                 (#f `(branch . ,(channel-branch guix-channel)))
                                 (commit `(tag-or-commit . ,commit)))))
                (checkout commit relation (update-cached-checkout
                                           (channel-url guix-channel)
                                           #:ref reference
                                           #:starting-commit
                                           %oldest-possible-commit)))

which works using my tests (with or without network).

The remaining issue is the order when displaying messages.  This
’validate-guix-channel’ happens before “Updating channel 'guix'”
therefore the progress bar appears before etc.

I have not investigated how to improve cached-channel-instance.  Let me
know if the current tiny fix tweaking resolve-interface is enough for
now waiting some rework of validate-guix-channel. :-)

Cheers,
simon




  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-04 17:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <cover.1689823648.git.maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
2023-07-20 16:34 ` [bug#64746] [PATCH 2/2] scripts: time-machine: Error when attempting to visit too old commits Maxim Cournoyer
2023-07-22  2:00   ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-08-08 15:58     ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-08-10 14:47       ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-08-10 16:56         ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-08-11  7:19           ` Josselin Poiret via Guix-patches via
2023-08-12 20:32             ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-08-15 18:57       ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-08-15 16:14   ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-08-16 14:46     ` Simon Tournier
2023-08-16 18:41       ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-08-17 14:06         ` [bug#65352] Fix time-machine and network Simon Tournier
2023-08-17 14:09           ` [bug#65352] [PATCH 1/2] guix: git: Fix the procedure reference-available? Simon Tournier
2023-08-17 14:09             ` [bug#65352] [PATCH 2/2] scripts: pull: Remove unused reference pair Simon Tournier
2023-08-17 15:41               ` [bug#65352] Fix time-machine and network Maxim Cournoyer
2023-08-17 16:08                 ` Simon Tournier
2023-08-23  2:56                   ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-08-23  8:32                     ` Simon Tournier
2023-08-23 20:25                       ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-08-21 14:00                 ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-08-21 15:58                   ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-08-22 16:27                     ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-08-23  2:14                       ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-08-21 13:57             ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-09-04  8:49             ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-09-04 11:34               ` Simon Tournier
2023-09-05 20:33                 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-09-05 20:48                   ` Simon Tournier
2023-09-04  9:32             ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-09-04 17:37               ` Simon Tournier [this message]
2023-09-06  0:22                 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-09-05 20:39               ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-09-05 20:56                 ` Simon Tournier
2023-09-06  2:39                   ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-09-05 13:24             ` bug#65352: " Maxim Cournoyer
2023-09-05 13:43               ` [bug#65352] " Simon Tournier
2023-09-06  0:04                 ` bug#65352: " Maxim Cournoyer
2023-09-06  0:58                   ` [bug#65352] " Simon Tournier
2023-09-06  2:00                     ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-09-07 11:15                       ` Simon Tournier
2023-09-06 10:32           ` [bug#65352] time-machine, unavailable network or Savannah down Simon Tournier
2023-09-06 14:17             ` [bug#65352] [PATCH v2] DRAFT git: Avoid touching the network unless needed in 'reference-available?' Simon Tournier
2023-09-13 20:16               ` [bug#65352] Fix time-machine and network Ludovic Courtès
2023-09-13  0:32                 ` Simon Tournier
2023-09-14  8:50                   ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-09-14  9:04                   ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-09-14  9:42                     ` Simon Tournier
2023-09-22 13:54                       ` bug#65352: " Simon Tournier
2023-09-25  9:32                     ` [bug#65352] " Ludovic Courtès
2023-09-25  9:57                       ` Simon Tournier
2023-09-25 11:21                         ` Simon Tournier
2023-09-25 15:01                         ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-09-25 15:58                           ` Simon Tournier
2023-09-06 17:41             ` [bug#65352] time-machine, unavailable network or Savannah down Maxim Cournoyer
2023-09-06 23:21               ` Simon Tournier
2023-08-15 19:44   ` [bug#64746] [PATCH v2 1/3] git: Clarify commit relation reference in doc Maxim Cournoyer
2023-08-15 19:44     ` [bug#64746] [PATCH v2 2/3] pull: Tag commit argument with 'tag-or-commit Maxim Cournoyer
2023-08-16 15:02       ` Simon Tournier
2023-08-16 18:47         ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-08-17 14:45           ` Simon Tournier
2023-08-17 18:16             ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-08-17 18:47               ` Simon Tournier
2023-08-23  2:54                 ` [bug#64746] [PATCH 2/2] scripts: time-machine: Error when attempting to visit too old commits Maxim Cournoyer
2023-08-23  8:27                   ` Simon Tournier
2023-08-15 19:44     ` [bug#64746] [PATCH v2 3/3] " Maxim Cournoyer
2023-08-16 15:39       ` Simon Tournier
2023-08-17  1:41         ` bug#64746: " Maxim Cournoyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wmx5on5n.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com \
    --cc=65352@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=ludo@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).