From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56410) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0Enb-00065D-9R for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:07:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0EnW-0000WX-HX for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:07:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54916) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0EnW-0000WN-5j for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:07:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d0EnV-0004EU-TW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:07:01 -0400 Subject: bug#26548: [PATCH] install: Enable SSH in installation image. Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <20170417215416.GB32573@jasmine> References: <20170417213030.1489-1-mbakke@fastmail.com> <20170417215416.GB32573@jasmine> Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 00:06:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87vaq2k7sw.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 26548@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Leo Famulari writes: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 11:30:30PM +0200, Marius Bakke wrote: >> Hi Guix! This patch adds an SSH server to the installation image >> to aid remote installations as requested in >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2017-01/msg00047.html >>=20 >> lsh-service depends on networking, so I pulled in a DHCP client too. >> It increases the image size by about 29MiB. >>=20 >> * gnu/system/install.scm (%installation-services): Add DHCP-CLIENT-SERVI= CE >> and LSH-SERVICE. > > I wonder, did you consider using OpenSSH instead? Are there any > advantages to using lsh here? I chose lsh mostly because I thought the GNU live image should use the GNU ssh implementation. For the intended usage (logging in once with a password to complete the installation), there is no difference to the end user. No strong opinion though :-) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlj1PIAACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPpLOgf+ME8pbVRLVLIo94eVbDnM6uXSCcIuRGKQXZiqvbskhuJkYksZWSDXX6uQ 9hS++HPXichMWVLv8ihaz4ybMe0nR38pxtMJ6q/7BqfSivJpfdweVkH9l53Wnd9U G7xpFLgKD6vGsU/W80L2fuLlsKzSljKVoD2NvqZDJq3icqW0fC7lonmqptKjssZ3 POmjCD829vamHCBWlMf/TeTq9NXJ3WpNwmrWMfAWkY24KJqwGD8oS5goQatNnVXV DY6Zlf9jHmEpkotazRMXua9xSmrfS8A/ml6cFUuNiykDppKfwApNXq6wUaSgO8NT TIIylDCZ71i5a6GzUlxCbAQQoGjulQ== =bFmq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--