From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtyXi-00020x-Rr for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 12:05:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtyXf-0001JA-Mk for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 12:05:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37985) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtyXf-0001Iw-Jd for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 12:05:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dtyXf-00076s-38 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 12:05:03 -0400 Subject: [bug#28491] [PATCH] doc: Add "Sending a Patch Series" subsection. Resent-Message-ID: From: Nicolas Goaziou In-Reply-To: <87y3pc2f84.fsf@gnu.org> (Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Mon, 18 Sep 2017 17:34:03 +0200") References: <20170918092030.9691-1-janneke@gnu.org> <87h8w089a5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87377k3wz3.fsf@gnu.org> <874ls0ca6b.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87y3pc2f84.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 18:04:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87vakgat8s.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Cc: 28491@debbugs.gnu.org Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Would it make sense to recall the need to close the thread by answering >> to ? This information is surprisingly >> hard to find. > > Yes, I think so. Added as a second patch, how is this? [...] > * doc/contributing.texi (Submitting Patches): Add a note about closing bug > threads by mailing to NNN-done@debbugs.gnu.org. See, I got it backwards once again ;) AFAIC, this all looks good. Thank you. I'll let others comment about it. Regards,