From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40263) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eeixw-0005pt-AY for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 09:57:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eeixb-0002sw-3M for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 09:57:24 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34808) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eeixa-0002rx-Qq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 09:57:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eeixa-0001Pr-CN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2018 09:57:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#30216] [WIP] system: Add ARM installer; services: agetty: Make tty optional Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20180122220011.7896-1-dannym@scratchpost.org> <87lggo7qjl.fsf@gnu.org> <20180123145452.57b9e1e6@scratchpost.org> Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 15:56:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20180123145452.57b9e1e6@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's message of "Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:54:52 +0100") Message-ID: <87vafqt2at.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: 30216@debbugs.gnu.org Hello! Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > I hope it's not that board-specific. There are minimal differences but > many ARM boards use the same Linux kernel (with the same config). > > This was one of the motivation to create u-boot: u-boot is like a > board-specific mini-Linux kernel. The Linux kernel that u-boot then > loads later is not board-specific. > > In the past, board vendors kept putting huge board configuration tables i= nside > Linux until Linus put a stop to it. > > Nowadays it should not be the case anymore that Linux is board-specific. Understood. > Therefore, I think it would be preferrable in the long run if > Hydra didn't build 1000 different 1 GB images for different boards > where the only different part is u-boot. Definitely! > So long story short, about 99% of the image this arm-installer generates > will work and be identical for almost every ARMv7 board, except for u-boot > (u-boot is kinda important, though). Yes, but=E2=80=A6 this 1% is enough to make a non-bootable image though, wh= ich is what I=E2=80=99m concerned with. :-) I suppose fixing it would mean having a universal ARM U-Boot? Or do you have other solutions in mind? Ludo=E2=80=99.