From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44380) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ezmaO-00064S-RI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 13:05:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ezmZK-00029H-Rd for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 13:04:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43767) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ezmZK-000299-Ne for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 13:03:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ezmZK-0003yM-3k for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 13:03:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#30851] [PATCH] Add SuperCollider, related changes Resent-Message-ID: From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <87vadsdcfv.fsf@gmail.com> <87po3wgw4w.fsf@gnu.org> <20180322121506.ohvxgjkfxwtutrxq@abyayala> <87fu4sgl99.fsf@gnu.org> <20180322175651.gltojjb5hjvn56kp@abyayala> <87sh8rvw28.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 18:02:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87sh8rvw28.fsf@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Fri, 23 Mar 2018 08:02:55 -0400") Message-ID: <87vadljtkb.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: 30851@debbugs.gnu.org, ng0 Hi Maxim, Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > For splitting to be "cheaper" (in terms of space and computation) than > using a separate output, the origin sources would have to be split into > core/sc-ide parts and be able to build the resulting parts distinctly. > > I have to check, but I don't expect the IDE to be buildable reusing > supercollider-core as an input; I'd expect it to depend on many source > files in the project. If so, I'll opt for multiple outputs to spare the > build farm from recompiling/testing the same thing in double, otherwise > I'll opt for splitting. Yeah, this sounds like the right criterion to me. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.