From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50352)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fIsRi-00081c-RD
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 05:10:13 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fIsRe-000080-WC
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 05:10:06 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56701)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1fIsRe-00007m-Tl
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 05:10:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fIsRe-0003fw-Mj
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 05:10:02 -0400
Subject: bug#31464: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-orgalist: Fix texinfo markup in
	description.
Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.31464.D31464.152646178114089.done@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <20180515200315.8491-1-boskovits@gmail.com>
	<87603owuae.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAE4v=piQ3SzoCm7WTUoPR3rJUChrxeyK3ezq07wJW1iJH8+mdQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87wow4vdu8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<20180515221621.436ca448@centurylink.net>
	<CAE4v=pj6M8_TxSkmQ+tiwt9d1J1ujEe0-0c6WUgz5twkQ3QumA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 11:08:55 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAE4v=pj6M8_TxSkmQ+tiwt9d1J1ujEe0-0c6WUgz5twkQ3QumA@mail.gmail.com>
	("=?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits"'s message of "Wed, 16 May 2018
	08:18:58 +0200")
Message-ID: <87vaboge6w.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com>
Cc: 31464-done@debbugs.gnu.org

Hello!

G=C3=A1bor Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com> skribis:

> 2018-05-16 5:16 GMT+02:00 Eric Bavier <ericbavier@centurylink.net>:
>
>> On Tue, 15 May 2018 22:55:11 +0200
>> Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote:
>>
>> > G=C3=A1bor Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com> writes:
>> >
>> > > This markup breaks guix package -s on current master.
>> > > And guix lint also says, that there is invalid markup in the
>> description.
>> > > You might mean @dfn{LaTeX}, though.
>> >
>> > Yet, @LaTeX{} is valid Texinfo code.
>>
>> Yes, but guile's (texinfo) module does not understand the entire set of
>> texinfo commands.  I'm not sure whether the subset it does understand
>> is even clearly documented.
>>
>>
> I guess that we can contribute the @LaTeX{} macro to the guile module,
> at least a simplified version for sure, but I don't think it will make
> before
> core-updates next. In my opinion this fix is an acceptable tradeoff.
> We might add a comment to modify the markup, once support lands
> in guile, if it is deemed necessary. WDYT?

Clearly Guile=E2=80=99s (texinfo) modules could be improved.  In the meanti=
me,
I=E2=80=99ve pushed this patch to fix the immediate issue.

Note that even when (texinfo) understands @LaTeX{}, we=E2=80=99ll probably
refrain from using it because Guix could be running on an older Guile.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.