From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34314)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jJurT-0007e5-LR
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 04:06:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jJurS-0005KY-PG
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 04:06:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55800)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jJurS-0005KO-M7
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 04:06:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jJurS-0007Yk-HI
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 04:06:02 -0400
Subject: bug#40350: [PATCH] ui: Mention that changes to package definitions
 can cause "upgrades".
Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.40350.D40350.158581471628894.done@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <c2ca777e9b3e9dbdc80d85ef02b3d27407f1122a.1585667732.git.leo@famulari.name>
 <871rp6udet.fsf@gnu.org> <20200401211352.GA9794@jasmine.lan>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 10:05:05 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20200401211352.GA9794@jasmine.lan> (Leo Famulari's message of
 "Wed, 1 Apr 2020 17:13:52 -0400")
Message-ID: <87v9miqpn2.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: 40350-done@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi,

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 11:03:22PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> Is that not implied in a way?
>
> It is, but I think we will still get some confused users asking about
> it.
>
>> If it is, how about something shorter like:
>>=20
>>   (dependencies or package changed)
>
> Yeah, I think that's okay.

OK, done!

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.