From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id sIQ+Mn/KJV/bNwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 20:03:11 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id KEHhLX/KJV/xLwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 20:03:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42B22940719 for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 20:03:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:36400 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k1xin-0008Lo-0U for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 16:03:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58708) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k1xig-0008Le-J3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 16:03:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57800) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k1xig-00021f-9v for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 16:03:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k1xig-0002Ve-3c for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 16:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#42348] [PATCH 0/4] Add xdg-desktop-portal Resent-From: Anders =?UTF-8?Q?Thun=C3=A9?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2020 20:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42348 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 42348-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 42348-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D42348.15963121489604 (code D ref 42348); Sat, 01 Aug 2020 20:03:02 +0000 Received: (at 42348-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Aug 2020 20:02:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41113 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k1xi7-0002Up-HH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 16:02:27 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f66.google.com ([209.85.167.66]:46326) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k1xi3-0002Ua-W5 for 42348-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 16:02:26 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f66.google.com with SMTP id i80so18532377lfi.13 for <42348-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 13:02:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :date:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Plv+s9QtQvKkm0c0OlrT/FaV0wmzCx0qKIbmoY8jra4=; b=UtcoLJdiwOf5/0fXmXbqrkNfgfmAnoHAL8B/UDp7vuhJreHRQbcYip6KXs6n1acfdH O7ENHbJK2UmcrVkPLtetd1p3XaFqDB6uxCJua3058JNQ0p0Oj11k2E2ak9jgPHJJnuvi qf351wT8H2focrMHzDyjPh2EAEVmO6zRmn49TQLc/QC4+cybTb93C/7ANA/L8yL+knK+ dH8tKw3jSXn9xXEYakIK/TDUI7vM3L17gOvL95Sq6l4I2HUZgt+OYhIqdorPaYSL3RdU a+6pirmGqErh78wI+ejDlrMDkvCvaSm0yrhdn9Cam1Xi4WVetWEct1PI5hVxdrCt9OPV 6rbw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:message-id:date:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Plv+s9QtQvKkm0c0OlrT/FaV0wmzCx0qKIbmoY8jra4=; b=RYDhjg1jZnOTHPfKNkUgNiqAFXBBDiptL1Q+KTSVpmEr8jX89zybWL8MmPgo06iLBt u3ZPloVQZnELX2nvYKiftWKXWmBDVcAyPCuf2lxZ38T+RFqkXaCDfBy6I/0QrYyzrHaD q4rEg0I4UaP7By5bSHZ7HzP8X2Of4T1QRQTWZeJZKYxfwyw5rkA21luMdmdGUEsfg/fj bFaSMolsIHKE8mRwo9rfKjT/Ulq+C+sIclMJn1hM8S+7Zy/3N9IT8DRa6IlrI42oLzMb /2SyEBIH6I10BKS/YZ7XctrklhoLPWBGz8+L0VS75N/pwS/eNtOcSvMPcu7Q06CzNv6i 8H8w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530kl77vgQVtlrY/Vg0dJlZwf3hFrJj34nskOyqFGhDVx+MqkEc1 6l5NF5uEMOLzEdIqHESTdG0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyIwTWIEdkc9Ri6DnncRcYtWYz9BnKfoH0463YfJfsWBgALnVrwSycBsQQuxijsldTH/6iW9Q== X-Received: by 2002:a19:1c6:: with SMTP id 189mr4906448lfb.158.1596312137808; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 13:02:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (c80-216-202-233.bredband.comhem.se. [80.216.202.233]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w3sm2324515ljh.123.2020.08.01.13.02.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 01 Aug 2020 13:02:17 -0700 (PDT) References: <20200713232024.22966-1-asse.97@gmail.com> <87r1sxz3hv.fsf@gnu.org> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.12; emacs 27.0.91 From: Anders =?UTF-8?Q?Thun=C3=A9?= In-reply-to: <87r1sxz3hv.fsf@gnu.org> Message-ID: <87v9i2f83h.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2020 22:02:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=UtcoLJdi; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: MDNCpZtVmYfa Hi Ludo, > It would be nice if you could check as a followup whether we can just > upgrade =E2=80=98pipewire=E2=80=99 to 0.3. See =E2=80=98guix refresh -l = pipewire@0.2=E2=80=99 for the > list of dependents to rebuild. I checked, `mutter` currently depends on pipewire 0.2 and does not build with 0.3. >> xdg-desktop-portal greatly improves the usability of Flatpak-installed a= pps, >> allowing them to open file chooser dialogs, open links, et.c. This was >> requested in issue 37289. > > You would still need to make it a dependency of Flatpak though, no? All that's needed is for xdg-desktop-portal and a backend to be installed in the profile alongside flatpak. To improve the user experience, I guess it would be good to make them a propagated dependency, yes. I didn't do so myself since I wasn't sure if it was worth propagating extra packages which aren't strictly necessary. > Applied, thanks! Great, thanks! Regards, Anders Thun=C3=A9