From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6LgxGbRnYWHkqgAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 11:58:12 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id yM7rE7RnYWF2cAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 09:58:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7FA8139AF for ; Sat, 9 Oct 2021 11:58:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59234 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZ97K-0007VO-P4 for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 05:58:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58896) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZ97C-0007Sm-86 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 05:58:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40766) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mZ97B-0004YB-Uw for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 05:58:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mZ97B-0003ml-NF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 05:58:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#50874] [PATCH] lint: Check if HTTPS version of HTTP URL exists. Resent-From: Xinglu Chen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2021 09:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50874 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 50874@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 50874-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50874.163377344914511 (code B ref 50874); Sat, 09 Oct 2021 09:58:01 +0000 Received: (at 50874) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2021 09:57:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52312 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mZ96e-0003lz-H6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 05:57:29 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:34214 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mZ96R-0003lY-Qd for 50874@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2021 05:57:27 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1633773429; bh=/38QMXp6EbbRoxcaTSz0p0Flu71Vi1aiv6+VtFbEiF8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=bis2hcHgeyCHHKZQltormRy5EwYBzi7Rfrt6CPvrLl77yOhuIo9v2xFcTZUmOayJP BGBH8QjIqdQdsQLwsxcBVoZkEyN/6fRlcsYhe4HUXTfEoVhZhEUM1lIvGrJK3ns5+F bH05wOPAubaJ8IYVkFV1OHeYMaQEmvoiUWxRTTgA= In-Reply-To: <877devwj95.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877devwj95.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2021 11:57:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87v926ldvv.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1633773492; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=Ridzz+LxbcRbcoF2w+iNgps5hkMCwisvy1A/Lp1vSJo=; b=MqRaDHygTatWYU0/czWY3yBFKVjA0VeCk90wKDgluvcyse3l91cpI9O+wuMyNeDBBB1Msk ABLWVSjrtyk7re7/nU2LWtHw3KHScx5djvB2ceFM3qmxoZlPCme2/xfJjkC2RCPN7FAyBm uhVTLiQbIBMlIk4311pZWSS/2BGbAiqobJ4+PhUcZD0rOaE2DSfeDvmkG2+vYd+oQkUzmo eyUo6djX/OHxTZ++LQ+OQaA2lY7bStZrwC78N2C30Sh+wJnFF52UzsRLrpRzDm4qClCRVj C7rQviwhuiYzpvfHYQebxq8prQqj3TT+fDBubprBPBiNp+i2MQiuZj0Uw7Qhow== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1633773492; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=I5dS11Rtq/3hjvbQR9OYVUQ03JN74SjPmK30Vyjjs2FJGUsDrOeNbWVvJ/2jigJk6dMoFT zz0cdf/RiHqLEAAHhVTFllDBQHnJhdnHGmjTBNvTH018qAfzLv3NnzT6BJHGMpLDxW4BeM cee17VFXXAFCyWC0+xRbED6y1qNGg1MkxwrvZ/NqpQn3CbB0Lz12Ls7P55OPwKQbz8i6Jh XJyLVK+WV3HkiqkldKHawrr4PWnDIHNf5o/y4gaqJg5gXjtCacFxEF4mipURTb0mku2nNr NAaKbe5peyll7NE96qwC+HhDbuSo9cNycfs1RgdVksSjpkl5cgcFRAceiKByUw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=yoctocell.xyz header.s=mail header.b=bis2hcHg; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=yoctocell.xyz (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.41 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=yoctocell.xyz header.s=mail header.b=bis2hcHg; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=yoctocell.xyz (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: B7FA8139AF X-Spam-Score: -3.41 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: 6lmL1Tk4PGnf --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 02 2021, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Hi, > > Xinglu Chen skribis: > >> * guix/lint.scm (check-if-https-uri-exists?): New procedure. >> (check-home-page, check-source): Use it. > > Applied, thanks! Was it? I don=E2=80=99t see it in the log. >> I don=E2=80=99t really know how to test this while making it future-proo= f, any >> suggestions? > > I don=E2=80=99t know either, since we don=E2=80=99t have an easy way to s= pin up an HTTPS > server. I think it=E2=80=99s okay to leave it as is, for lack of a bette= r idea. > > However, this version of the patch leads to test failures in > tests/lint.scm (=E2=80=9CConnection refused=E2=80=9D). Thanks for catching this; I will look into it. Good that you didn=E2=80=99t apply it then. :-) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEAVhh4yyK5+SEykIzrPUJmaL7XHkFAmFhZ3QVHHB1YmxpY0B5 b2N0b2NlbGwueHl6AAoJEKz1CZmi+1x5G8MQAIRb9hCAiGe8IUTXo5W5DEIGpnNJ hsb2Cb6Leq28CsamOC1RL+020pyo5mdUSXR0aiCjpQB4xo7h4hUt7t05+x0ArmwK lliynomsDadwcKrFIdzHYQhznCdEqo+Kj48UZz70XpZfbO6JgnYYK+L52Kt1BL0a 1HkIeFhugbY3zzmihN9oAOGlZgwlQpdURAUYO8Asf7CC5GlkO2PWQOBmhKC6U6oB k2YkNXiBmXoDW7cHtFnXhVqtTPYIsliF1uidSKrfeo2YvFTFw4dwJ6OGLic2IGFP H2E7FZFpYKFhzPrMJiwxShuDaA1bW5nRCv+2Y2nB/uU/kOjKhULT/fyhgctiNabq VJuqK71ntk/1jjhM2N9IdPDJFluJ+rd0jQ6yVUVDNuGaP69qjtxSKIoAcdCXSokA XGU3cWTN7Y6u6dSiNuwj7s7g7nupz7BRaZ4YUZ+ykcbCxlOUjDIwpQjO5kv4QwAU T+XpNY6azoIBEJ4GTc6nokCNivB9NeaZJ2LfxBU2r1culMonMHgLAJAFAgp7Oz2G nKSNyeVN2azDCO9aJbhViX6EpKulXii4DgNdwxsRXGv2Ox3QSQDvUXU97Zias8AI djcTFoz1Wp5AX/3FYzDnXpibJkbiEaIbdk8BVpw5QGY02r0wsbFVBYnsfdEO4rNj MKx5/JTnxNZ2YilN =R/nz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--