From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6PD+GMGl/2bXFAEAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2024 08:22:25 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6PD+GMGl/2bXFAEAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2024 10:22:25 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=PGmDe29s; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=GyDhL0+9; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1728030145; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=eMfSS3DiYLtP4YhaTjMgrny22MnJdJHhq9SwmAVzuig=; b=C0nRDsePWBaUd1NxCPYOlyFRSjSGFxWbDwZFMlfTLC6J7QYBeUSRrZmATs1cPiXWtoB7xn s/GEFv34GhyVhuze7pCps27YyBdjtDMaKRM3vkFCK5UOhwqlzxVeeH70K2OnmVo1AUXjhl n2w2+QhplhkZ/fXcok+8+V5phLEU8lIihq7r5aSJnLPvWtj9HEP2QNnAcClO5ZY8a7LcfY IwhWB0UO1uV5QZ3Gr8/TkH4n1dx2xm6uyfVSkk2vO2RhshdL0hDF+hal/NqAbHEjmYDIEh sUQDMVBCCV+zHwGpkW28uj+FrLx1qWL9XEsY0IHWovyTVHMHVU38HA5LgN0gGA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debbugs.gnu.org header.s=debbugs-gnu-org header.b=PGmDe29s; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=GyDhL0+9; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1728030145; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=cgcegMRVgMv7rdMUEPLY/OHdk3EAAXSr+kE7/gPhEzVpqN9N9t1b3Vp5HfLaijV2W4rnYO YZfnkgLoZP4VGODkJCthZaQLcSc2EaSAU2v3BF7kmvf8Hyp3iSNLSwP143yYLT4mNlp9yq Sk4neNnqOndXUQCKGFfZuNhr8EwHLBTTymqGdqUF6kTX/UzMHrr0F0r2uzvEfnl3SED/rR mvjEe1sbdq+g16WTQ9swnWkdHhQ6GHcP5vaMGcZI1xbtkwqI5SMeji4gtVAEOMMnl60VIa 3JO5vkmSRn9Y1VktpEABV4HTTBOgYgXA8+vGtb5mUcHl1Sd9XLdf8lxFCi2gEQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F6668AC6D for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2024 10:22:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1swdZa-0006lP-L8; Fri, 04 Oct 2024 04:22:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1swdZY-0006lC-EH for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2024 04:22:00 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1swdZX-00034N-TQ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2024 04:21:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=eMfSS3DiYLtP4YhaTjMgrny22MnJdJHhq9SwmAVzuig=; b=PGmDe29sa9zLw+dnWU023+pDf02rr1OLTNfMxWOIFWPzqFlUqfdIp4OKHB8masMZ0sqQy6WwOY/PTzmQgQluLuc/DtUSOQ12JTjnfUGTCicbUQkuSLHhMU1QzSkri1uSb3/p21ny5RfxR5gfgKlzaz3ICELD2+p1RU9xCFSd/dOFhCxJ+Ec2cz2FOcKwbR16eexZo0X9sDsuzxY6UkbBn1QYWdkAb0t23FnDycnkR7dSRnnX4YPK9wcJY/Amb4XW4VnpWlk4j0EN1a01H0MKslNSHUAbYM1ujBYKgbQ33CDyhr/zSIfNiUa8yv6Iylo+XmDUxTkLMCj09TtZ1MhqaQ==; Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1swdZa-00068L-8G for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2024 04:22:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#73288] Request for merging "mesa-updates" branch Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 08:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 73288 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Steve George Cc: john.kehayias@protonmail.com, Sharlatan Hellseher , =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= , 73288@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 73288-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B73288.172803010423545 (code B ref 73288); Fri, 04 Oct 2024 08:22:02 +0000 Received: (at 73288) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Oct 2024 08:21:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34362 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1swdZH-00067h-HS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2024 04:21:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43566) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1swdZF-00067M-IG for 73288@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2024 04:21:42 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1swdZ4-00032a-C1; Fri, 04 Oct 2024 04:21:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=eMfSS3DiYLtP4YhaTjMgrny22MnJdJHhq9SwmAVzuig=; b=GyDhL0+92TL0kunx4j34 teTOEUBR3nAErN0oO/CXepftdUjgLw8aCBWB1qzTp5cPD6AMTqIRW9Nikixdw3fwjfFkDexNpNPQ/ I97DnX1SIteT/8voHhe0/07MQp+rpe74UP58jMe+vvCJhLPofgheFGrgaoc8MxCN61lbLVIiI05Lw SK48zhZv411yIc1v9qMMCfWjl45xboWJ2T8QxXW9TmxCPwKJwcoBPguOTtZKZhSx1khQSCDL5YEJn 911XloDKNjpbhnBiuNTgskZCJJv2a53eoGe3y0lime4t9nPJJdwenNDsmfnVFijPlG6iaD+U8izH+ WJIuJSR5zDeRMA==; From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= In-Reply-To: <69a3b3fb-4317-4d8d-b5a2-104dd62c8222@futurile.net> (Steve George's message of "Thu, 3 Oct 2024 09:56:17 +0100") References: <87cyki6xbi.fsf@gmail.com> <69a3b3fb-4317-4d8d-b5a2-104dd62c8222@futurile.net> Date: Fri, 04 Oct 2024 10:21:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87v7y8s2go.fsf_-_@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -0.27 X-Spam-Score: -0.27 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 3F6668AC6D X-TUID: uu7haqItmUJr Hello! Steve George skribis: > On 02/10/2024 21:53, Sharlatan Hellseher wrote: > (...) >> The current queue of branches awaiting for review and merge: >> | 71408 | python-team | Fri Jun 07 10:55:25+0200 2024 | Done >> | >> | 72959 | fonts-split-outputs | Mon Sep 02 12:55:25+0200 2024 | Open | >> | 73104 | r-team | Sat Sep 07 17:55:24+0200 2024 | Open | >> | 73288 | mesa-updates | Mon Sep 16 04:38:25+0200 2024 | Open | >> | 73502 | go-team | Thu Sep 26 23:40:25+0200 2024 | Open | >> | 73515 | qt-team | Fri Sep 27 14:46:24+0200 2024 | Open | >> | 73558 | wip-gsl-upgrade | Sun Sep 29 22:33:24+0200 2024 | Open | >> | 73567 | lisp-team | Mon Sep 30 15:43:28+0200 2024 | Open | >>=20 > (...) >> - https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/r-team >> #73104 I've pinged R team members if that branch may be merged, the >> changes touch just R packages from CRAN and Bioconductor. QA passed. > (...) > > What's the definition of when a branch looks good for merging? Does > some % of substitutes have to be achieved, and for which > architectures? > > https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/r-team shows 96% for x86_64 which is .4 > % higher than current master [0]. So it's a win by merging it! ;-) > Seriously, it's also at 96% for aarch64-linux (bordeaux). So "it looks > good to me". > > If that's the case, what prevents this "just" being merged? > > Presumably r-team demonstrated their desire for it to be merged by > opening the merge request ticket. Is it a break in process if someone > else does it? (rather than waiting for them to respond). My take is that by filing a =E2=80=9Crequest to merge=E2=80=9D, you claim r= esponsibility for carrying out the work until it=E2=80=99s merged, unless otherwise state= d. To me, R team folks are responsible for merging =E2=80=98r-team=E2=80=99 be= cause they=E2=80=99re the one who know and they haven=E2=80=99t expressed the desire to get it me= rged when it=E2=80=99s good on qa.guix (they didn=E2=80=99t click on =E2=80=9Cau= to-merge=E2=80=9D, in GitLab parlance ;-)). That said, if there=E2=80=99s no feedback from the R team in a timely fashi= on, maybe it=E2=80=99s OK to move to the next branch in the queue. FWIW, I also pinged =E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6 regarding =E2=80=98fonts-sp= lit-outputs=E2=80=99. If we can=E2=80=99t get it merged real soon, we should probably skip it. Thoughts? Ludo=E2=80=99.