From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41343) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2Ohr-0001MZ-8i for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 17:06:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2Ohm-0001T7-1L for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 17:06:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38636) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2Ohl-0001T1-UA for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 17:06:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d2Ohl-0005du-Kc for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 17:06:01 -0400 Subject: bug#26618: Add 0ad Resent-Message-ID: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41277) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2Oh7-0001M9-S8 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 17:05:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2Oh2-0001Qs-VY for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 17:05:21 -0400 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:36412) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d2Oh2-0001Q5-Mq for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Apr 2017 17:05:16 -0400 References: <87mvb7vrdv.fsf@lassieur.org> <20170423120751.3xm4fpbxtx2jk3fr@abyayala> <20170423205410.y2to2njp4qyzmvia@abyayala> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur In-reply-to: <20170423205410.y2to2njp4qyzmvia@abyayala> Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 23:05:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87tw5erg1l.fsf@lassieur.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: ng0@pragmatique.xyz Cc: 26618@debbugs.gnu.org ng0@pragmatique.xyz writes: > ng0 transcribed 0.8K bytes: >> Clément Lassieur transcribed 0.4K bytes: >> > Theses patches add 0ad and mozjs-38 (a dependency). I worked in >> > cooperation with ng0. >> > >> > 0ad needs a window manager that supports 'Extended Window Manager >> > Hints'. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_Window_Manager_Hints >> > for a list. >> > >> > I did not try multiplayer mode. I ran it with Awesome WM, so I did not >> > test the icons and desktop things: I'm not sure about it. >> > >> > Please let me know if you see anything wrong :) >> >> Wow, it's finally finished :) Games are the worst. Either they are small >> and take a short time to package, or they take almost a year. I think I >> started with this in August, in parallel to many other packages. >> >> So cool, thanks for finishing this! >> >> I will review this on monday or tuesday if no one else picks it up. >> -- >> PGP and more: https://people.pragmatique.xyz/ng0/ > > I get this error message: > > [user@abyayala ~/src/guix/review/guix]$ make; ./pre-inst-env guix package -i 0ad > make all-recursive > make[1]: Entering directory '/home/user/src/guix/review/guix' > Making all in po/guix > make[2]: Entering directory '/home/user/src/guix/review/guix/po/guix' > make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/user/src/guix/review/guix/po/guix' > Making all in po/packages > make[2]: Entering directory '/home/user/src/guix/review/guix/po/packages' > make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/user/src/guix/review/guix/po/packages' > make[2]: Entering directory '/home/user/src/guix/review/guix' > Compiling Scheme modules... > LOAD (gnu packages games) > ;;; note: source file ./gnu/packages/games.scm > ;;; newer than compiled /home/user/src/guix/review/guix/gnu/packages/games.go > ;;; note: source file ./gnu/packages/gnuzilla.scm > ;;; newer than compiled /home/user/src/guix/review/guix/gnu/packages/gnuzilla.go > Backtrace: > 14 (primitive-load "/home/user/src/guix/review/guix/./buil…") > In ice-9/eval.scm: > 619:8 13 (_ #(#(#(#(#(# …) …) …) …) …)) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 268:13 12 (for-each # ("gnu/pa…" …)) > 2792:17 11 (resolve-interface (gnu packages games) #:select _ # _ # …) > 2718:10 10 (_ (gnu packages games) _ _ #:ensure _) > 2986:16 9 (try-module-autoload _ _) > 2316:4 8 (save-module-excursion _) > 3006:22 7 (_) > In unknown file: > 6 (primitive-load-path "gnu/packages/games" #) > In ice-9/eval.scm: > 619:8 5 (_ #f) > 626:19 4 (_ #) > 293:34 3 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(# …) …) …) …) …) …) …) …) …)) > 173:39 2 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(# …) …) …) …) …) …) …) …) …)) > 223:20 1 (proc #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(# …) …) …) …) …) …) …) …) …)) > In unknown file: > 0 (%resolve-variable (7 . license:arev) #) > > ERROR: In procedure %resolve-variable: > ERROR: Unbound variable: license:arev > make[2]: *** [Makefile:5075: make-go] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/user/src/guix/review/guix' > make[1]: *** [Makefile:4202: all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/user/src/guix/review/guix' > make: *** [Makefile:2792: all] Error 2 > ;;; WARNING: loading compiled file /run/current-system/profile/lib/guile/2.0/site-ccache/gnutls.go failed: > ;;; ERROR: In procedure load-thunk-from-memory: No such file or directory > ;;; note: source file /home/user/src/guix/review/guix/gnu/packages/gnuzilla.scm > ;;; newer than compiled /home/user/src/guix/review/guix/gnu/packages/gnuzilla.go > ;;; note: source file /home/user/src/guix/review/guix/gnu/packages/gnuzilla.scm > ;;; newer than compiled /run/current-system/profile/lib/guile/2.0/site-ccache/gnu/packages/gnuzilla.go > ;;; note: source file /home/user/src/guix/review/guix/gnu/packages/games.scm > ;;; newer than compiled /home/user/src/guix/review/guix/gnu/packages/games.go > ;;; note: source file /home/user/src/guix/review/guix/gnu/packages/games.scm > ;;; newer than compiled /run/current-system/profile/lib/guile/2.0/site-ccache/gnu/packages/games.go > guix package: warning: failed to load '(gnu packages games)': > ERROR: Unbound variable: license:arev > guix package: error: 0ad: unknown package It depends on another bug: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=26588 Sorry, I should have said it. I did tell debbugs that one patch was blocking the other though.