From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49962) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d5QN0-0004Fg-Fi for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2017 01:29:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d5QMx-0002NJ-Ck for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2017 01:29:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51981) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d5QMx-0002NA-7t for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2017 01:29:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d5QMw-0000YL-5Q for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 02 May 2017 01:29:02 -0400 Subject: bug#26723: [PATCH] gnu: grub: Update to 2.02 Resent-Message-ID: From: Maxim Cournoyer References: <87d1btnyv1.fsf@gmail.com> <20170501021150.GA8422@jasmine> <8760hlnsxd.fsf@gmail.com> <20170501171716.GA5442@jasmine> Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 22:28:38 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20170501171716.GA5442@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Mon, 1 May 2017 13:17:16 -0400") Message-ID: <87tw53q12x.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 26723@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Leo! Leo Famulari writes: > On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 12:43:10PM +0900, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> writes: >> > I decided to wait for i686-linux to work again [0] before pushing, sin= ce >> > it's not practical for me to build the entire i686-linux base system at >> > the moment. >>=20 >> OK, sorry, I had missed it! Could you use the mirror://gnu/... URI that >> I used in my patch when you get around to merging this? > > Sure, it's in my local tree. > Great! >> Also, I'm not sure I understand why the kernel Linux depends on the >> bootloader? I did run 'guix refresh -l grub' and it told me that >> nothing else depended on it. > No, I don't have such experience. It was just my misunderstanding; please disregard it! Thanks, Maxim --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEJ9WGpPiQCFQyn/CfEmDkZILmNWIFAlkIGQYACgkQEmDkZILm NWIoRA//UxWY/lmFAUj6yFG3WF64wu5Z93mRlS8F4TMVR+FhgSJTfqe8ellr/PDF MLEO9lqEbzxJ+HYYqr6gchFg/SWugwM6ugrY2VBflpusFMheIOyBbzpU2r8cicYA hmWuDKX76577N5rfpayamvElvjgG5HkfTJLIvq7Vwk48czxy5fBz7xFPHroguouI B5T7inHiWXCiciLFgfY3eZOPpoAdNuRr2OlrQpFe+jD4IunTPQGF6IZ9G+oJkvjb GIpRO1fYa8on42g6rF0Jw/Pg+MWA/d1weIkYukPI5mX8lhof5dVN43bIHlveF92F c82HMYYrEUVF8zunQoxxZgtYuZqRwbm1QwH2qomP5Yn3gljN4/o1pSGhGw17Fwf6 KihUgm1lKbDa+vQsq/d+hDeuC6zT2JiIepFgGGNAkAk2HUBVug5BzO234humC6Lt 01mpkWfG3L6tzboPl9MMsCj+LTR/taQg9G+oGyIvTa1G3OZqGXtEjOdBbyz1gaLT jux0AHr5IpsZ569VLOx4Iuyow8znhAe6P0OVrXkFE2/kt/1on8sgKuCgJM4vXIoS 8yh3EXqYEfbYIQVHxMZtCNaR96InON9tEu7ChkG6UDXl3toB68wVwvoiN8s8u/wW dKZokWv6sTxRtnmHr8DfGD/zMgwt+ZBe7UpeACO3ALC8EpKQq+4= =refr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--