From: Dave Love <fx@gnu.org>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludovic.courtes@inria.fr>
Cc: 27850@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#27850] gnu: mpi: openmpi: Don't enable thread-multiple
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 17:06:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tw1r9sss.fsf@i-ulialbion.it.manchester.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87lgn3skmm.fsf@inria.fr> ("Ludovic \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?Court\=E8s\?\= \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?\=22's\?\= message of "Tue, 1 Aug 2017 11:27:45 +0200")
Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes@inria.fr> writes:
> Dave Love <fx@gnu.org> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès <ludovic.courtes@inria.fr> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>>> (arguments
>>>> `(#:configure-flags `("--enable-static"
>>>>
>>>> - "--enable-mpi-thread-multiple"
>>>
>>> Should we upgrade our openmpi package instead of doing this?
>>
>> I don't know whether they've fixed all the breakage I knew about in
>> OMPI 2 or whether there's still any penalty from thread-multiple. 1.10
>> seems fairly safe, but I don't have strong opinions if people think 2 is
>> solid. Apart from ABI incompatibility, I assume it has the usual
>> incompatibilities at the mpirun/MCA level, and that they aren't well
>> documented.
>
> ABI compatibility is normally not an issue with Guix, so I’d be in favor
> of upgrading to 2.0.3. Would you like to do it?
Maybe, but what about the non-ABI compatibility I expect there is? (I
don't know whether there's still any penalty from thread-multiple
anyhow; I guess not, as I see it's not the default.) 2.1 probably also
needs non-trivial work in figuring out whether it still needs a bundled
libevent, for instance.
If anyone's using it seriously, I'd have thought effort would be better
spent on support for SLURM (as it's in Guix) and supporting
high-performance fabrics (which I started on).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-01 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-27 15:01 [bug#27850] gnu: mpi: openmpi: Don't enable thread-multiple Dave Love
2017-07-31 15:16 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-07-31 18:09 ` Dave Love
2017-08-01 9:27 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-08-01 16:06 ` Dave Love [this message]
2017-08-01 17:39 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-08-01 20:10 ` Dave Love
2017-08-21 13:17 ` bug#27850: " Ludovic Courtès
2017-08-23 11:08 ` [bug#27850] " Dave Love
2017-08-23 21:34 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-09-01 10:35 ` Dave Love
2017-09-01 22:10 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-09-07 16:16 ` Dave Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87tw1r9sss.fsf@i-ulialbion.it.manchester.ac.uk \
--to=fx@gnu.org \
--cc=27850@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=ludovic.courtes@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).