From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48030) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hhNzj-0008Or-Q3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 20:47:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hhNzi-0004UK-Dm for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 20:47:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59785) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hhNzi-0004U9-A9 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 20:47:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hhNzi-0003BB-6T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 20:47:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#36411] [PATCH] gnu: Add libresprite. Resent-Message-ID: From: zerodaysfordays@sdf.lonestar.org (Jakob L. Kreuze) References: <87y31m7d62.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <30d2762e-8cea-fa2d-24df-68a019fcea90@riseup.net> <8736jthkkd.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87mui1flpv.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> <87mui0lal9.fsf@dustycloud.org> Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 20:45:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87mui0lal9.fsf@dustycloud.org> (Christopher Lemmer Webber's message of "Sat, 29 Jun 2019 10:39:30 -0400") Message-ID: <87tvc7dhpu.fsf@sdf.lonestar.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Christopher Lemmer Webber Cc: 36411@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Christopher Lemmer Webber writes: > I wonder also if there are any significant benefits to keeping > aesprite around if we have libresprite. What do you think? Maybe > aesprite could become an alias for the new libresprite. Thoughts? If my build system changes for unbundling duktape and simpleini are merged upstream, that would probably make sense. Then we wouldn't need to add a similar patch for aseprite. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEa1VJLOiXAjQ2BGSm9Qb9Fp2P2VoFAl0YBg4ACgkQ9Qb9Fp2P 2VoVkw/+PP/Q4ytSvRE5IOnmPpnp2+PTByucdL9UeYgeG6EG9IUI+B+bqcuG8Vot PEcOcsRJzRUu7K7XseFMcBWqTbarUk8EoSTRZp4UBQ/55kdro8qwg/Uy4yW6XOYo 1lrsKWpo29MLR4j044TeKG1EhH2E0pUU2hIw5Jkw7VQXDLlvm6Sefbu3jLb4Oh1A YwSQL9xVv2Wm+f9CWCbh50N1TpnPb4A45DSlszFCbrwprSY+e0TljznpgqPFMkxt UnRvGAiZtGj+xum0IBSXNAmz9UrXpB80jvQtSBEt9r1es3cMKkAZTH/N61/P3E9W Ufw2PICMdHE7x/hyU3vQV7voRl/K8ajNT9pYBFQJvtY2iQCLBbt8Ylfonc89BlE5 pVBiitEBtqPbxPpLEggRLiPDaYgQrb1raTk1+RuKkPLC2sIomBpZKxgje3HuyOz5 KZ6k4LPAYOqb7ubkP4tVK0sSoDUB4qqfGYvC2Omh69qhIGF93kcY1F8P2v68ldXH DBgPKvn4f2X4/GKnwbNp4OqGmtHXRykNRK3Hb9WE1+pAl2Dj3UO06CIHAK41lnSC MuevVyLWeXdzC3UiZgM8UYu5qocrURzvUJNIS3dhccWFcDUtwuZh50AYyG++H2MD X9105kwB4wU5eQ3BekKcQ6q1G0DEXsY3nF57yrS6WhP60xckom8= =5coB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--